Dissemination of Cochrane Resources Beyond the Library

Clarkson, Jan E; Bonetti, Debbie

doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.06.002

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2012

2014

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 31 publications

(27 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results indicate that a number of promotional strategies and personal characteristics of the disseminators are associated with its utilisation. To our knowledge, this study is the first attempt to investigate the evidence-based strategies behind diffusion of the Cochrane Library 16 24 25…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dissemination of systematic reviews in a hospital setting: a comparative survey for spreading use of the Cochrane Library

Weng

Hsu

Shih

et al. 2012

Postgraduate Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dissemination of systematic reviews in a hospital setting: a comparative survey for spreading use of the Cochrane Library

Weng

Hsu

Shih

et al. 2012

Postgraduate Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Towards a methodology for literature reviews in social sciences

Saur-Amaral

2014

iirh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emergence of the Internet, the generalized access to online databases and top journal presence in these databases generated a shift in how literature reviews are to be performed. While fifteen-twenty years ago, researchers in social sciences would focus their efforts in finding journal articles to analyze and they would read and use some dozens of articles in their research, nowadays efforts fall upon selecting the right set of articles, reading and synthesizing in such ways that helicopter and detailed views are combined. There is a generational gap between senior and junior researchers, which so far has turned difficult the development of a methodological perspetive of literature reviews in social sciences that bring together both perspetives. Our paper develops a methodology for literature reviews in social sciences, combining the systematic literature review approach, proposed and applied by several authors in management field (Kofinas & Saur-Amaral, 2008; I. Saur-Amaral & Amaral, 2010; Irina Saur-Amaral & Borges Gouveia, 2007; Thorpe, Holt, Macpherson, & Pittaway, 2005; Tranfield, Denyer, & Smart, 2003; Tranfield & Mouchel, 2002), with the traditional literature review approach (Cook & Leviton, 1980; Hart, 2006; Webster & Watson, 2002). We present compare perspetives, analyzing them from a critical perspetive and we propose a combined approach to be tested and used for research in social sciences, indicating key validity concerns to be taken into account. Results are useful for senior and junior researchers in social sciences, which undertake literature reviews for their own or for group research.

show abstract

Dissemination of Cochrane Resources Beyond the Library

Cited by 2 publications

References 31 publications

Dissemination of systematic reviews in a hospital setting: a comparative survey for spreading use of the Cochrane Library

Dissemination of systematic reviews in a hospital setting: a comparative survey for spreading use of the Cochrane Library

Towards a methodology for literature reviews in social sciences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About