2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2013.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissemination and institutionalization of public sector accounting reforms in less developed countries: A comparative study of the Nepalese and Sri Lankan central governments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
194
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
7
194
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, this lack of focus on human agents and their actions within organisations has been a key weakness of the earlier institutional-based studies (Dillard, Rigsby, & Goodman, 2004;Tsamenyi, Cullen, & Gonzalez, 2006). Recent studies drawing on new institutionalism have therefore acknowledged that the support and competence of organisational actors (for instance, bureaucrats and accountants) can play a vital role in the institutionalisation/deinstitutionalisation of public sector accounting reforms in a specific context (Hyndman & Connolly, 2011;Pollanen & Loiselle-Lapointe, 2012;Adhikari, Kuruppu, & Matilal, 2013). Claims have been made that it is due to the involvement of actors at different levels that organisations respond differently to similar reforms, leading to diverse outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, this lack of focus on human agents and their actions within organisations has been a key weakness of the earlier institutional-based studies (Dillard, Rigsby, & Goodman, 2004;Tsamenyi, Cullen, & Gonzalez, 2006). Recent studies drawing on new institutionalism have therefore acknowledged that the support and competence of organisational actors (for instance, bureaucrats and accountants) can play a vital role in the institutionalisation/deinstitutionalisation of public sector accounting reforms in a specific context (Hyndman & Connolly, 2011;Pollanen & Loiselle-Lapointe, 2012;Adhikari, Kuruppu, & Matilal, 2013). Claims have been made that it is due to the involvement of actors at different levels that organisations respond differently to similar reforms, leading to diverse outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mimetic mechanism is concerned with emulating the ubiquitous practices in the field which have a tag of being successful and modern. A stream of public sector literature draws on these three mechanisms to explain how the adoption of accrual accounting has become an integral element of legitimacy-seeking behaviour, thereby illuminating the case of accounting choices within organisations (Carpenter & Feroz, 2001;Adhikari, Kuruppu, & Matilal, 2013;Irvine, 2008;Ball & Craig, 2010). Ensuring legitimacy has been indispensable for public sector entities, not only to avoid critical questions regarding their activities but also to portray their image as modern and rational organisations in their operating contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kondisi ini identik dengan kondisi awal sebagian besar negara lain yang mengimplementasikan SAP akrual (Adhikari, Kuruppu, & Matilal 2013;BuneaBontas & Petre 2009;Ridder et al 2005;Tickell 2010). Stigma pemerintahan pusat dan daerah yang tidak produktif, tidak efisien, kurang inovatif, minus kreativitas dengan pelayanan yang lamban dan berbelit harus dihilangkan.…”
Section: Kontribusi Kapabilitas Penginderaanunclassified
“…Some previous research show that governments in some countries in southern hemisphere apply accounting tools in government entities because of external pressures rather than internal organization needs [1,5,7]. Therefore, this study attempts to find out the logical thinking on why budget is important to government entities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%