According to World Health Organization (WHO)-defined criteria, patients presenting clinically as essential thrombocythemia (ET) may show early primary myelofibrosis (PMF) with accompanying thrombocythemia [1]. Previous clinicopathological studies revealed that laboratory parameters like gender-matched hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC) count, and particularly lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values are significantly different in PMF [2]. By strictly applying the WHO criteria, our investigation was aimed to study sensitivity and specificity of these features in an exploratory cohort of 536 patients and to validate the results on an independently recruited series of 321 strictly corresponding patients. The discriminatory power of these parameters (Hb, WBC, and LDH) was tested by plotting their receiver operating characteristic curves. The best performance was found for LDH (areas under the curve, AUC 5 0.7059). WBC and Hb had superimposable curves, with AUC of 0.6279 and 0.6257, respectively. A diagnostic algorithm was generated by applying these parameters in a stepwise fashion. Nearly half of the patients could be correctly allocated to WHOdefined ET or early PMF in both cohorts investigated. It is important to note that this result does not substitute bone marrow morphology with hematological parameters, however, in clinical practice may alert physicians to get more suspicious of early PMF in a patient presumably presenting with ET.Following current criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO), patients presenting with a clinical picture of essential thrombocythemia (ET) can actually have an early primary myelofibrosis (PMF) [3]. Incidences may vary depending on the accuracy of applied diagnostic guidelines [4][5][6] and was recently reported in about 18% of cases of socalled ET [7]. Laboratory tests which are significantly different in early PMF as compared with histologically confirmed ET (WHO-ET) include decreased Hb, increased white blood cell (WBC) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values. Although bone marrow biopsy represents the gold standard for differentiating WHO-ET from early PMF [8], in clinical practice it might be very useful to know whether one or more of these baseline laboratory parameters may help to differentiate these two entities. To tackle this issue, we evaluated sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of blood cells counts and LDH for the diagnosis of early PMF versus WHO-ET in an exploratory cohort of 536 histologically diagnosed patients aimed to propose an algorithm for the practical clinical use of these tests. This algorithm was then applied to an independently recruited validation cohort of 321 patients presenting with similar diagnosis of early PMF versus WHO-ET. The starting point of this study was an international database of 1,071 patients with ET either confirmed by WHO criteria (891 cases) or revised to early PMF (180 cases) as detailed elsewhere [7]. From this database, 536 patients (50%) who had complete laboratory data measured at diagnosis were extracted and c...