2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disseminated haemangioblastoma without evidence of the von Hippel–Lindau syndrome or haemangioblastomatosis—A case report and clinico-pathological correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature review revealed only 12 patients reported with cerebrospinal fluid dissemination of cerebellar hemangioblastoma. [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 14 15 ] With our report, the total number of patients described in literature would be 14. The demographic characteristics and various other factors been delineated in the Table 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Literature review revealed only 12 patients reported with cerebrospinal fluid dissemination of cerebellar hemangioblastoma. [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 14 15 ] With our report, the total number of patients described in literature would be 14. The demographic characteristics and various other factors been delineated in the Table 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Fewer than 20 individual cases of disseminated disease are reported in the literature [4-6, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. The most typical scenario entails discovery of a relatively small number of tumor deposits along the brain stem and spinal cord, generally years after initial diagnosis and/or treatment of a cerebellar hemangioblastoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an extensive review of the literature in PubMed and Google Scholar using the terms “Hemangioblastoma,” “Hemangioblastomatosis,” “Leptomeningeal dissemination,” and “von Hippel–Lindau,” we found 30 similar cases reported in the past 46 years [ Table 1 ]. [ 1 - 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 22 - 27 , 30 , 32 , 33 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean age of patients at the first surgery was 44.8 years old (range, 4–75);[ 13 , 26 ] In some reports, it was difficult to precisely determine the age of the patients at the first surgery, mainly due to incomplete or unavailable medical records. [ 3 , 20 , 25 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%