2019
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissecting the Multiplicity of Immune Effects of Immunosuppressive Drugs to Better Predict the Risk of de novo Malignancies in Solid Organ Transplant Patients

Abstract: De novo malignancies constitute an emerging cause of morbidity after solid organ transplant (SOT), significantly affecting the long-term survival of transplant recipients. Pharmacologic immunosuppression may functionally impair the immunosurveillance in these patients, thereby increasing the risk of cancer development. Nevertheless, the multiplicity and heterogeneity of the immune effects induced by immunosuppressive drugs limit the current possibilities to reliably predict the risk of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
(209 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Review Article on Strategies to Achieve Long-Term Success of Lung Transplantation have been associated with increased risk of cancer after solid organ transplantation (SOT) (5). In the setting of impaired cell-mediated immunity, oncogenic viruses such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human papilloma virus (HPV) and others have emerged as major risk factors for cancer development (4,6). Various immunosuppressive agents/regimens may also directly impact cancer risk that is independent of their effects on the overall level of immunosuppression.…”
Section: Induction Agents That Deplete T-lymphocytes In Particularmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Review Article on Strategies to Achieve Long-Term Success of Lung Transplantation have been associated with increased risk of cancer after solid organ transplantation (SOT) (5). In the setting of impaired cell-mediated immunity, oncogenic viruses such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human papilloma virus (HPV) and others have emerged as major risk factors for cancer development (4,6). Various immunosuppressive agents/regimens may also directly impact cancer risk that is independent of their effects on the overall level of immunosuppression.…”
Section: Induction Agents That Deplete T-lymphocytes In Particularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessary requirement for post-transplant chronic immunosuppressive therapy and resulting impairment of anti-tumor immune surveillance and anti-viral activity is thought to have a central role in cancer development (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many animal models and in vitro studies describe IST effects, but few studies detail effects of in vivo chronic posttransplant IST exposure on human PBMC 3,32,46,50,54,55,72‐75 57–64 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pharmacologic IST utilization is accompanied by substantial rates of cardiovascular and renal damage, diabetes, infection, and therapy-related malignancies as well as socioeconomic costs of chronic medication dependence. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Graft survival remains a problem. 4,7 Therefore, alternatives producing similarly low rates of acute and/or chronic graft rejection while minimizing toxicities of chronic pharmacologic IST are desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the most commonly and effectively used immunosuppressive drugs used after organ transplantation are rapamycin (Rapa) and cyclosporine A (CsA) (Enderby and Keller 2015;Moini et al 2015). For many years, their main targets were thought to be T cells; however, it has recently been found that immunosuppressive agents could also inhibit DC maturation and allostimulatory capacity (Cangemi et al 2019;Macedo et al 2012). Not only has this provided a new insight into the immunopharmacology of these substances, but it also offers novel strategies for the manipulation of DCs ex vivo prior to organ transplantation to promote tolerance induction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%