2011
DOI: 10.2478/s11534-011-0099-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissecting cosmic-ray electron-positron data with Occam’s razor: the role of known pulsars

Abstract: Ê Ú ¾¿ Ë ÔØ Ñ Ö ¾¼½½ ÔØ ½ ÇØÓ Ö ¾¼½½ ×ØÖ ØWe argue that both the positron fraction measured by PAMELA and the peculiar spectral features reported in the total electron-positron flux measured by ATIC have a very natural explanation in electron-positron pairs produced by nearby pulsars. While this possibility was pointed out a long time ago, the greatly improved quality of current data potentially allow to reverse-engineer the problem: given the regions of pulsar parameter space favored by PAMELA and by ATIC, ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
159
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 199 publications
(173 reference statements)
10
159
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pulsars are potential sources which could produce primary e ± at high energy [29][30][31][32]38]. Electrons can be accelerated by the strong magnetosphere of the pulsars, and this acceleration produces photons.…”
Section: E ± From a Single Pulsarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pulsars are potential sources which could produce primary e ± at high energy [29][30][31][32]38]. Electrons can be accelerated by the strong magnetosphere of the pulsars, and this acceleration produces photons.…”
Section: E ± From a Single Pulsarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have proposed some interpretations, such as dark matter annihilation or decay [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], supernova remnants (SNRs) [18][19][20][21][22][23], secondary production in the interstellar medium (ISM) [24], and pulsars [16,17,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Cosmicray flux data can also be taken together with other observations (like the dark matter relic density and the direct detection experimental results etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are some tantalizing excesses in the mono-energetic gamma ray signal around 135 GeV observed by the Fermi-LAT [70][71][72][73][74][75] and in the positron excesses at a few GeV ∼ TeV scale observed by PAMELA, Fermi, and AMS02 Collaborations [76][77][78]. However, it is still unclear that the origin of the excesses comes from annihilation or decay of dark matter or astrophysical backgrounds [79,80]. In this paper, we assume that the excesses are originated in the astrophysical phenomena.…”
Section: Constraints From Indirect Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the measured PF rises with energy may therefore point to nearby sources of primary positrons, either from dark matter annihilation (e.g., [8]), or of astrophysical origin. The latter class of sources may include supernovae (e.g., [9]), pulsar wind nebulae (e.g., [10]), young or mature pulsars (e.g., [11,12]), and millisecond pulsars (MSPs; [13]). In this paper, we investigate the cosmic-ray flux contribution of the latter source class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%