2015
DOI: 10.1080/10476210.2015.1034679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruptive design in pre-service teacher education: uptake, participation, and resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The demands on pre-service teachers after the Covid-19 pandemic are greater because they must have various learning innovations. Therefore, this research supports Anderson and Justice (2015) study that for pre-service teachers to have learning innovation and motivate students to learn, they must also receive the necessary teaching training. Thus, virtual reality helps them to have basic teaching skills in the classroom (Dong, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The demands on pre-service teachers after the Covid-19 pandemic are greater because they must have various learning innovations. Therefore, this research supports Anderson and Justice (2015) study that for pre-service teachers to have learning innovation and motivate students to learn, they must also receive the necessary teaching training. Thus, virtual reality helps them to have basic teaching skills in the classroom (Dong, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Several previous studies have shown that pre-service teachers in the current technological era must have digital literacy skills and good technology use skills (Satriana et al, 2022;Van Allen & Zygouris-Coe, 2019;Lohnes Watulak, 2016). In addition, pre-service teachers must also have a variety of learning innovations that can motivate students in learning (Anderson & Justice, 2015). So, at LPTK there are microteaching activities for pre-service teachers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online-based learning has several advantages for teachers. It encourages teachers to participate in interactive learning (Hamilton et al, 2001;Mumford & Dikilitaş, 2020), which can be done anywhere and anytime (Zhang & Liu, 2019); it becomes information technology literacy for teachers to improve their learning management skills independently and open opportunities for good collaboration with teachers in other areas or experts in a field of science (Glava & Glava, 2011; 409 Krutka et al, 2014;Prenger et al, 2017); it is more practical and flexible because it does not require formal classrooms; the approach used is a blended learning implementation (Han et al, 2019); delivery of material can be done online tools such as photos and videos (Anderson & Justice, 2015;Bayram, 2012); the learning process can be documented or recorded, so learning material can be stored in digital form; it is less paper or other stationery However, in online learning in Indonesia, there are still some challenges. Indonesia is an archipelago that consists of many small isolated islands and a lack of facilities and infrastructure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the course design and the implementation were centred around the MTEs' own "theory of change", grounded in the stance that subject knowledge per se is not a main consideration for the facilitation of practical, inquiry-based and theoretical work that values and develops students' mathematical knowledge and mathematical thinking. We summarise the theory of change here, focusing in particular on how the course designer aims to use confrontation to disrupt teachers' preconceptions [23] and promote a radical change in their practice (for a detailed account, see Eriksen and Solomon [24]). Drawing on a Realistic Mathematics Education philosophy [25], Silje and Daniel aimed to enable participants to develop a reform-based approach by:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having systematically looked for problems of practice in both datasets, we continued our analysis of dataset one by identifying teachers' assumptions about their cause and what would constitute "help" (in terms of learning), that is, their framing of their particular problems of practice. In the analysis of dataset two, we drew more interpretively on Anderson and Justice's definition of disruption as "an analytical construct that allows for the investigation of how individual learning and changes in local practice mutually influence the other within a purposefully designed learning context" ( [23] p. 401). In doing so, we identified disruptions as described by the teachers when comparing differences between their previous experiences of, and beliefs about, teaching and the teaching approaches and activities advocated and used in the course.…”
Section: Individual Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%