1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)53064-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of receptor-G protein coupling in yeast promotes the function of an SST2-dependent adaptation pathway.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current model of signal transduction by G proteincoupled receptors involves the isomerization of the receptor from an inactive to an active form. Using mutational analysis, the sixth transmembrane domain and the third cytoplasmic loop were implicated in receptor activation (51)(52)(53) and polar residues in transmembrane domain 6 of Ste2p were suggested to interact with other domains of the receptor (54). Previously we reported that an 18-residue homologue, M6-18L (252-269, C252A, P258L) corresponding to the constitutively active receptor Ste2p-P258L, was a highly R-helical structure in SDS micelles but was a β-structure in HFA-water (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current model of signal transduction by G proteincoupled receptors involves the isomerization of the receptor from an inactive to an active form. Using mutational analysis, the sixth transmembrane domain and the third cytoplasmic loop were implicated in receptor activation (51)(52)(53) and polar residues in transmembrane domain 6 of Ste2p were suggested to interact with other domains of the receptor (54). Previously we reported that an 18-residue homologue, M6-18L (252-269, C252A, P258L) corresponding to the constitutively active receptor Ste2p-P258L, was a highly R-helical structure in SDS micelles but was a β-structure in HFA-water (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…because a dominant-interfering phenotype (attenuation of agonist-induced growth arrest and/or reporter gene expression) was still observed when: the ability of the mutant receptor to interact with G proteins was disrupted (by introducing the L236R substitution in cis in its third cytoplasmic loop which we previously showed does not affect agonist binding affinity or receptor expression [13]; Figure 3a,d,g,j); G protein α, β and γ subunits were overexpressed approximately 10-20-fold from a high-copy plasmid carrying the genes encoding each subunit expressed from their normal promoters (Figure 3e-g); and the wild-type receptor was fused to the G α subunit (Figure 3h-j). Third, overexpression of mutant receptors (10-fold from the PGK1 promoter) blocked FRET between CFP-and YFP-tagged tailless wild-type receptors (data not shown) without affecting expression of tagged receptors, as indicated by quantitation of CFP and YFP fluorescence and fluorescence microscopy.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create the STE2-KEX2 chimera, PCR fragments encoding relevant portions of STE2 and KEX2 were produced with the creation of a unique BglII site at the chimera junction. A 750-bp fragment of STE2 (Nakayama et al, 1985) encoding amino acids 45-297 was amplified from pRS314-STE2 (Weiner et aL, 1993) using the primers 5'-GCTTCTAGAGTTAA-CAGTACTGTTACTCAG-Y (primer A) and 5'-GGAAGATCTCGTG-GCCCACATTGATGA-3'. A 650-bp fragment of KEX2 (Fuller et al, 1989) that encodes the entire cytoplasmic tail of Kex2p from amino acids 701-814 as well as roughly 300 bases of the 3' untranslated region was amplified from pJ2B (Julius et aL, 1984) with the primers 5'-GGAAGATCT-TCAAGGAGAAGGATCAGA-3' (primer B) and 5'-CGCGGATC-CTIT/'TAATACACCAAAGA-3' (primer C).…”
Section: Construction Of Stex22 and Mutant Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%