2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1104392/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of Proprioceptive Information During Electrical Stimulation of the Cutaneous Afferents

Abstract: Restoration of proprioception with neurotechnology is critical to improve effectiveness of robotic neuro-prostheses. Unfortunately, after initial enthusiasm clinical results showed that unlike touch, proprioception could not be reliably induced. Here we show that concurrent activation of multiple sensory modalities may trigger unwanted sensory regulation mechanisms that disrupt proprioception. We recorded intra-spinal neural activity induced by stimulation of proprioceptive afferents from the radial nerve in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although important advances have been shown in the field, the artificial experience of somatosensation is still far from the natural one, and for this reason, its beneficial impact is still limited. Indeed, somatosensation is strongly connected to the sense of proprioception (Proske & Gandevia, 2012) (both force sense, motion sense and skin stretch), the thermal sensations (Melzack et al, 1962) and pain sensations (Melzack & Wall, 1965) that are extremely difficult to elicit or impossible to control with the current status of the somatosensory neurotechnology (D'Anna et al, 2019; Katic et al, 2021). More effort should be focus of developing novel interfaces with thousands of channels (Musk & Neuralink, 2019; Steinmetz et al, 2021) for a better communication and, in parallel, novel algorithms for a more selective and effective neural activation (Formento et al, 2020; Raspopovic et al, 2017; Valle, Mazzoni, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although important advances have been shown in the field, the artificial experience of somatosensation is still far from the natural one, and for this reason, its beneficial impact is still limited. Indeed, somatosensation is strongly connected to the sense of proprioception (Proske & Gandevia, 2012) (both force sense, motion sense and skin stretch), the thermal sensations (Melzack et al, 1962) and pain sensations (Melzack & Wall, 1965) that are extremely difficult to elicit or impossible to control with the current status of the somatosensory neurotechnology (D'Anna et al, 2019; Katic et al, 2021). More effort should be focus of developing novel interfaces with thousands of channels (Musk & Neuralink, 2019; Steinmetz et al, 2021) for a better communication and, in parallel, novel algorithms for a more selective and effective neural activation (Formento et al, 2020; Raspopovic et al, 2017; Valle, Mazzoni, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%