2019
DOI: 10.1002/ps.5689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α6 mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 confers resistance to spinosyns in Plutella xylostella

Abstract: BACKGROUND The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 system provides some advantages over other reverse genetic techniques to investigate the causal relationship between insecticide resistance phenotype and candidate gene. Several studies published to date point to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) α6 subunit strongly associated with spinosyns resistance in insects, including Plutella xylostella. However, reverse genetic verification of the P. xylostella nAChRα6 has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(174 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetically modified Seα6‐KO strain exhibits high levels of resistance to both spinosad and spinetoram compared with the WH‐S strain. Similar levels of resistance to spinosyns were observed in D. melanogaster and P. xylostella by using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The genetically modified Seα6‐KO strain exhibits high levels of resistance to both spinosad and spinetoram compared with the WH‐S strain. Similar levels of resistance to spinosyns were observed in D. melanogaster and P. xylostella by using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the present work, the obtained Cry1Fa resistance was confirmed to be genetically associated with the 8-bp deletion of OfABCC2, which excludes the CRISPR-mediated off-target effects on resistance phenotype. We analyzed 18 research cases that employed the CRISPR/Cas9 system to manipulate the resistance genes to Bt toxins or insecticides, and found that only five of them performed linkage analysis between acquired resistance and the introduced mutation, including the knockout of the cadherin gene in H. armigera [40], nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α6 subunit in P. xylostella and S. exigua [41,42], the ryanodine receptor G4946E mutation in Drosophila melanogaster [43], and a CYP9M10 gene in Culex quinquefasciatus [44]. We therefore recommend that when CRISPR-based gene editing is conducted to verify the function of a candidate gene, it is necessary to perform a genetic linkage analysis in order to clarify whether there are off-target effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetically modified Haα6‐KO strain exhibits high levels of resistance to both spinosad and spinetoram compared with the parent SCD strain. Comparable levels of resistance to spinosyns are also observed in the α6 knockouts of D. melanogaster , P. xylostella and S. exigua established by using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Further, we investigated the role of Haα7 of H. armigera in spinosyn toxicity, but found knockout of Haα7 had no effect on susceptibility to spinosyns and the other four insecticides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%