1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0893-133x(98)00081-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of Latent Inhibition in Rats with Postnatal Hippocampal Lesions

Abstract: Disruption of latent inhibition has been proposed asVarious animal models have been used to study pathophysiological and pharmacological aspects of schizophrenia. With regard to the etiology and pathophysiology of this disease, several authors proposed that neurodevelopmental abnormalities in limbic key structures of the medial temporal lobe might play a crucial role and that some clinical aspects can be explained by an early acquired limbic dysfunction (for review see Bogerts 1997). Recently, a novel animal m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another series of studies have focused on neonatal damage of restricted brain regions in rats (Lipska et al 1993;Flores et al 1996a;Chambers et al 1996;Wan et al 1996Wan et al , 1998Wan and Corbett 1997;Brake et al 1999, Black et al 1998Grecksch et al 1999;Schroeder et al 1999) and in monkeys (Beauregard and Bachevalier 1996;Bertolino et al 1997;Saunders et al 1998;Bachevalier et al 1999). The main objective of many of these studies is to disrupt development of the hippocampus, a brain area consistently implicated in human schizophrenia (Falkai and Bogerts 1986;Jeste and Lohr 1989;Bogerts et al 1990;Suddath et al 1990;Eastwood et al 1995Eastwood et al , 1997Eastwood andHarrison 1995, 1998;Weinberger 1999), and thus disrupt development of the widespread cortical and subcortical circuitry in which the hippocampus participates.…”
Section: Neonatal Brain Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another series of studies have focused on neonatal damage of restricted brain regions in rats (Lipska et al 1993;Flores et al 1996a;Chambers et al 1996;Wan et al 1996Wan et al , 1998Wan and Corbett 1997;Brake et al 1999, Black et al 1998Grecksch et al 1999;Schroeder et al 1999) and in monkeys (Beauregard and Bachevalier 1996;Bertolino et al 1997;Saunders et al 1998;Bachevalier et al 1999). The main objective of many of these studies is to disrupt development of the hippocampus, a brain area consistently implicated in human schizophrenia (Falkai and Bogerts 1986;Jeste and Lohr 1989;Bogerts et al 1990;Suddath et al 1990;Eastwood et al 1995Eastwood et al , 1997Eastwood andHarrison 1995, 1998;Weinberger 1999), and thus disrupt development of the widespread cortical and subcortical circuitry in which the hippocampus participates.…”
Section: Neonatal Brain Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adolescence and adulthood (postnatal day 56 and older), lesioned animals display markedly changed behaviors thought to be primarily linked to increased mesolimbic/nigrostriatal dopamine transmission (motor hyperresponsiveness to stress and stimulants, enhanced stereotypies). They also show enhanced sensitivity to glutamate antagonists (MK-801 and PCP), deficits in PPI and latent inhibition, impaired social behaviors and working memory problems (Lipska and Weinberger 1993, 1994a, 1994bLipska et al 1995a;Grecksch et al 1999;Al-Amin et al in press;Hori et al 1999), phenomena showing many parallels with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Neonatal Brain Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nVHLX model, which involves permanent excitotoxic damage to the VH during a sensitive period in early postnatal development, results in a wide range of neuronal abnormalities hypothesized to contribute to the development of SZ, including: decreases in dendritic spine density in NAC and PFC (Flores et al, 2005); abnormal activation of PFC and NAC neurons in response to mesocorticolimbic stimulation (Goto and O'Donnell, 2002;O'Donnell et al, 2002); and altered regulation of cortical cholinergic activity (Alexander et al, 2009;Brooks et al, 2011;Laplante et al, 2004). The nVHLX model also reveals a range of SZ-like cognitive impairments, including: reductions in prepulse inhibition (Le Pen and Moreau, 2002) and latent inhibition (Grecksch et al, 1999); deficits in working memory (Lipska et al, 2002a;Brady et al, 2010) and cognitive flexibility (Marquis et al, 2008;Brady, 2009) tasks, which are known to be heavily reliant on appropriate hippocampal-PFC-NAC interactions (Chambers et al, 1996;Floresco et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NVHL rats have been studied by several groups as a comprehensive animal model of schizophrenia. NVHL rats show post-adolescent onset of neurolepticresponsive, positive-like symptoms, such as hyper-responsivity of dopamine-mediated behaviors (Lipska et al 1993;Lipska and Weinberger 1994) accompanied by a number of schizophrenia-related cognitive and negative-like symptoms Chambers et al 1996;Grecksch et al 1999;Lipska et al 1995). In applying this animal model toward understanding increased substance use disorder (SUD) comorbidity in schizophrenia, NVHL rats show increased vulnerability to developing an addicted phenotype in acquisition, maintenance and post-withdrawal phases of COC self-administration (Chambers and Self 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%