2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of HIV-1 co-receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 in primary human T cells and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using base editing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This exploration identifies key limitations and drivers of functional EV-mediated delivery, including a potential mechanism of receptor binding-mediated delivery enhancement to T cells. We validate these technologies by demonstrating a therapeutically relevant capability—delivering Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) to ablate the gene encoding the HIV co-receptor CXCR4 27,28 in primary human CD4 + T cells.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This exploration identifies key limitations and drivers of functional EV-mediated delivery, including a potential mechanism of receptor binding-mediated delivery enhancement to T cells. We validate these technologies by demonstrating a therapeutically relevant capability—delivering Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) to ablate the gene encoding the HIV co-receptor CXCR4 27,28 in primary human CD4 + T cells.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Each method has advantages and disadvantages, and depending on the intended application and target cell type, the right delivery method should be selected. These methods can be based on viral delivery [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ] or lipid vector delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system [ 55 ], but genome editing can also be facilitated through fusion of the Cas9 protein to cell-penetrating peptides [ 56 ], or by directly electroporating the CRISPR/Cas9 system into cells of interest [ 27 , 55 , 57 , 58 ]. Interestingly, recently, the mechanism HIV-1 employs to target CD4 + T cells has been repurposed as a tool to direct viral particles containing the Cas9 system specifically to cells expressing CD4, i.e., T cells [ 59 ], opening up new potential avenues with this addition to the CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox [ 60 ], e.g., in vivo gene editing of CD4 + T cells.…”
Section: Gene Editing Basics—mode Of Action and Different Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it was shown that dual knockout of CXCR4 and CCR5 is feasible in primary human CD4 + T cells [ 54 , 98 ]. Furthermore, knocking out both chemokine receptors did not impact survival and proliferation [ 54 , 98 ], and allowed T cells to retain their in vitro cytokine production [ 27 ]. Importantly, double knockout also conferred in vitro resistance to HIV infection with both CXCR4- and CCR5-tropic HIV strains [ 27 , 54 , 98 ].…”
Section: Simultaneous Deletion Of Ccr5 and Cxcr4 Via Crispr/cas9-medi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using cytosine base editors, they introduced premature stop codons in the CCR5 and CXCR4 genes and mutated the CCR5 start codon using adenine base editors. The efficiency of edits detected in primary CD4 + T cells and HSPCs was high, around 90%, albeit biallelic KO was lower ( Knipping et al., 2022 ). Unlike NHEJ-mediated gene KO, base editing produces much fewer off-target mutations because of the lack of dsDNA breaks, offering precise DNA modification as in HDR-related editing, and, therefore, can be considered a promising technology.…”
Section: Perspectives In Crispr/cas Anti-hiv Therapy and Concluding R...mentioning
confidence: 99%