1994
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90384-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of a putative working memory task and selective expression of brain c-fos following microwave-induced hyperthermia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, microwave exposure did not result in any measurable elevation of the protein products of immediate-early genes or of heat shock or glial marker proteins [Fritze et al, 1997a]. This observation is in agreement with other studies investigating exposure to continuous or pulsed 600 MHz or 1.6 GHz or ultrawideband (0.25-2.5 GHz) microwaves in rats and mice showing that elevated expression of c-Fos protein is only observed at exposure intensities producing hyperthermia [Mickley et al, 1994;Morrissey et al, 1999], but not at lower powers producing no temperature changes [Walters et al, 1995;Morrissey et al, 1999]. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that acute exposure of rats to continuous or pulsed microwaves in the nonthermal range does not lead to any relevant activation of immediate-early and heat shock genes.…”
Section: Effects On Gene Responses and Dna Damage Effects On Gene Ressupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, microwave exposure did not result in any measurable elevation of the protein products of immediate-early genes or of heat shock or glial marker proteins [Fritze et al, 1997a]. This observation is in agreement with other studies investigating exposure to continuous or pulsed 600 MHz or 1.6 GHz or ultrawideband (0.25-2.5 GHz) microwaves in rats and mice showing that elevated expression of c-Fos protein is only observed at exposure intensities producing hyperthermia [Mickley et al, 1994;Morrissey et al, 1999], but not at lower powers producing no temperature changes [Walters et al, 1995;Morrissey et al, 1999]. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that acute exposure of rats to continuous or pulsed microwaves in the nonthermal range does not lead to any relevant activation of immediate-early and heat shock genes.…”
Section: Effects On Gene Responses and Dna Damage Effects On Gene Ressupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Alteration of behaviors that suggest changes in cognitive performance, both learning and memory, have also been reported for exposures that result in overt heating of the animal subject [Nelson, 1978;Luttges, 1980;Beel, 1983;Mickley et al, 1994]. The human studies utilize partial body exposures at low power densities and cannot be easily explained by overt heating of the body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Table 1 lists average absorbed power values and SARs in the rats irradiated in the main study, as calculated using Equation (1). All the SARs are well below the threshold of 5 mW/g above which absorbed radiation is likely to result in thermal effects [19,20]. Note the great similarity between the SAR patterns of the two experimental groups; the difference between the effects of radiation on picrotoxin-treated and untreated rats (see below) cannot be attributed to differences in power absorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%