2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disrupting the order of things: Public housing tenant organizing for material, political and epistemological justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…provides an innovative opportunity to study a structured intervention process for developing public housing tenants’ collective empowerment in multiple settings, also contributing to a theoretical framework of contextual factors that facilitate or impede such an intervention process. As public housing authorities are generally relatively unfamiliar with tenant empowerment practices, they tend to form a highly hierarchical structure within which tenants have little real control over the choice of their dwelling and many aspects of their residential environment [ 96 ]. Thus, tenants are often captive of a stigmatized residential environment, bound by numerous rules (which they have not contributed to formulating), and denied direct contact with landlords and decision-makers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…provides an innovative opportunity to study a structured intervention process for developing public housing tenants’ collective empowerment in multiple settings, also contributing to a theoretical framework of contextual factors that facilitate or impede such an intervention process. As public housing authorities are generally relatively unfamiliar with tenant empowerment practices, they tend to form a highly hierarchical structure within which tenants have little real control over the choice of their dwelling and many aspects of their residential environment [ 96 ]. Thus, tenants are often captive of a stigmatized residential environment, bound by numerous rules (which they have not contributed to formulating), and denied direct contact with landlords and decision-makers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As argued by Butler and Athanasiou (2013: 2), in dispossession persons are ‘disowned and abjected by normative and normalizing powers that define cultural intelligibility and that regulate the distribution of vulnerability’. Situated research against housing dispossession thus necessarily needs to engage with and counter epistemic violence, which many have argued is a fundamental component of the systemic violence inherent to large‐scale renovation of social housing (Thurber and Fraser, 2016; Baeten et al ., 2017). On the Heygate, as on many other council estates across the UK, the cultural intelligibility of the lives of residents has long been affected by the territorial stigmatization (Hancock and Mooney, 2013) that has accompanied a policy of residualization (Cole and Furbey, 1994).…”
Section: Situated Research Against Epistemic Violence and ‘Agnotology’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This included correcting MDHA's erroneous reporting and presenting new data at MDHA board meetings, in letters to the editor, and through numerous public speaking events throughout the city. In addition, organizers used findings to build partnerships with trade unions, city-wide organizing networks, and with residents of other public housing projects facing redevelopment (for a fuller discussion of Cayce United outcomes, see Thurber & Fraser, 2016). These groups hope to collaboratively develop a Community Benefits Agreement, a binding agreement designed to create targeted job training and employment opportunities for residents of all public housing projects when redevelopments take place.…”
Section: From Violence To Restorative Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%