2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.174114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disrupting long-range polar order with an electric field

Abstract: Electric fields are known to favor long-range polar order through the aligning of electric dipoles in relation to Coulomb's force. Therefore, it would be surprising to observe a disordered polar state induced from an ordered state by electric fields. Here we show such an unusual phenomenon in a polycrystalline oxide where electric fields induce a ferroelectric to relaxor phase transition. The non-ergodic relaxor phase with disordered dipoles appears as an intermediate state under electric fields during polariz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23][24]39 For SBT2 sample, two additional current peaks (P 2 ) appear at lower-field region, suggesting the presence of relaxor phase and a twostep transition processes during loading or unloading of external field: the P 2 peak corresponds to the ferroelectricrelaxor transition with the disruption of polar domains into nanodomains, while the P 1 peak indicates the relaxorferroelectric transition with the coalescence and re-formation of large domains. [21][22][23][24][39][40][41] Furthermore, the increase in fraction of ergodic relaxor phase moves the P 2 peak to near zero field for SBT5 sample, similar to those of SBT0 and SBT2 samples at Please do not adjust margins Please do not adjust margins their T FR (inset of Fig. 6(a)), revealing the critical transition nature of SBT5 composition.…”
Section: In-situ Polarization Current Responsementioning
confidence: 56%
“…[21][22][23][24]39 For SBT2 sample, two additional current peaks (P 2 ) appear at lower-field region, suggesting the presence of relaxor phase and a twostep transition processes during loading or unloading of external field: the P 2 peak corresponds to the ferroelectricrelaxor transition with the disruption of polar domains into nanodomains, while the P 1 peak indicates the relaxorferroelectric transition with the coalescence and re-formation of large domains. [21][22][23][24][39][40][41] Furthermore, the increase in fraction of ergodic relaxor phase moves the P 2 peak to near zero field for SBT5 sample, similar to those of SBT0 and SBT2 samples at Please do not adjust margins Please do not adjust margins their T FR (inset of Fig. 6(a)), revealing the critical transition nature of SBT5 composition.…”
Section: In-situ Polarization Current Responsementioning
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, the enhanced P FR can be attributed to the increased fraction of the FE phase. On the other hand, the macrodomains are irreversibly formed within the disordered nanodomains or PNRs under a high electric field . Because of the stronger interactions between polar clusters and the strain induced by domain reorientation, a much higher P FR value must be applied to overcome the poling effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each test temperature between 20°C and 100°C, there are four anomalies within one full cycle, two J 1 and two J 2 . J 1 corresponds to the forward phase transition while J 2 represents the backward process . Heated up from the vicinity of T d (20°C), the forward phase transition tends to become harder, that is, E J1 (the electric field at J 1 ) is supposed to increase .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J 1 corresponds to the forward phase transition while J 2 represents the backward process. 48 Heated up from the vicinity of T d (20°C), the forward phase transition tends to become harder, that is, E J1 (the electric field at J 1 ) is supposed to increase. 49 In BNKT-2.5Nb, E J1 increases linearly between 20°C and 50°C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%