2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disrupted implicit motor sequence learning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder revealed with ambidextrous Serial Reaction Time Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is less clear is the long-term nature of that change. Indeed, many studies use experimental designs that lack a baseline and do not assess the stability in time of the sequence knowledge: the experiment is organized such as long sequence blocks are followed by random blocks, sometimes followed again by long sequence blocks (Chrobak et al, 2017;Deroost & Soetens, 2006;Martini et al, 2013;Nissen & Bullemer, 1987;Unsworth & Engle, 2005). In these cases, if an immediate effect is consistently observed (RT difference between sequence and random blocks), the encoding of the sequence in memory is not tested, as there is no distinction between training (long sequence block with multiple repetitions) and testing (short sequence blocks with few repetitions).…”
Section: Definition Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is less clear is the long-term nature of that change. Indeed, many studies use experimental designs that lack a baseline and do not assess the stability in time of the sequence knowledge: the experiment is organized such as long sequence blocks are followed by random blocks, sometimes followed again by long sequence blocks (Chrobak et al, 2017;Deroost & Soetens, 2006;Martini et al, 2013;Nissen & Bullemer, 1987;Unsworth & Engle, 2005). In these cases, if an immediate effect is consistently observed (RT difference between sequence and random blocks), the encoding of the sequence in memory is not tested, as there is no distinction between training (long sequence block with multiple repetitions) and testing (short sequence blocks with few repetitions).…”
Section: Definition Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paradigm, a repeated sequence is inserted between random blocks without the participants' knowledge. The sequence repetition is thought to induce implicit learning of the sequence, measured as the difference in response time (RT) between sequence and random trials (Chrobak et al, 2017;Deroost & Soetens, 2006;Martini et al, 2013;Nissen & Bullemer, 1987;Unsworth & Engle, 2005). In addition, offline improvement of this implicit learning during a daytime interval has been observed (Brown et al, 2009;Cohen et al, 2005;Press et al, 2005;Robertson et al, 2004b;Sami et al, 2014), suggesting that sleep is not necessary to consolidate implicitly learned motor skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When correlated with the phenotypes database on GN, the most significant correlation was with visual discrimination learning using a touchscreen assay, mean reaction time to nose-poke in 3-month-old males (GN 16210, rho = −0.8137, p = 2.06e-05, N = 17). This is of interest, as reaction time is known to be disrupted in schizophrenia patients and their relatives (Chrobak et al, 2017).…”
Section: Mouse Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing number of studies point toward implicit motor deficits in SZ and BD (Chrobak et al, 2017(Chrobak et al, , 2015. Implicit motor learning relies on improving a sequence of motor acts through their repetition without conscious awareness of the exposure to the task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%