2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disrupted Axonal Fiber Connectivity in Schizophrenia

Abstract: Background Schizophrenia is believed to result from abnormal functional integration of neural processes thought to arise from aberrant brain connectivity. However, evidence for anatomical dysconnectivity has been equivocal, and few studies have examined axonal fiber connectivity in schizophrenia at the level of whole-brain networks. Methods Cortico-cortical anatomical connectivity at the scale of axonal fiber bundles was modeled as a network. Eighty-two network nodes demarcated functionally specific cortical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
323
5
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(95 reference statements)
34
323
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The only other comparable study was published almost simultaneously by Zalesky et al (2011). Unlike van den Heuvel et al (2010), Zalesky et al (2011) report global reductions in whitematter connectivity, rather than more subtle regional changes in connectivity.…”
Section: Review Of Van Den Heuvel Et Almentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only other comparable study was published almost simultaneously by Zalesky et al (2011). Unlike van den Heuvel et al (2010), Zalesky et al (2011) report global reductions in whitematter connectivity, rather than more subtle regional changes in connectivity.…”
Section: Review Of Van Den Heuvel Et Almentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The only other comparable study was published almost simultaneously by Zalesky et al (2011). Unlike van den Heuvel et al (2010), Zalesky et al (2011) report global reductions in whitematter connectivity, rather than more subtle regional changes in connectivity. While these reported differences may arise from the relatively small sample size in both studies and the heterogeneity of neuropathology in schizophrenia, it is also worth mentioning an important methodological difference between the two studies.…”
Section: Review Of Van Den Heuvel Et Almentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many of the most common psychiatric conditions are now known to involve brain network dysfunction, including schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, depression and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) (Insel, 2010;Zalesky et al, 2011;Cocchi et al, 2012;Fornito et al, 2012). Studies of the human connectome have provided a means to delineate subtypes of psychiatric disorders based upon neurobiology, to characterize the neural basis of specific symptoms, and to monitor the brain's response to treatment, as well as defining neural markers of illness (Filippi et al, 2013;Fornito et al, 2015).…”
Section: Insert Figure 1 Near Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a nonparametric permutation test (10,000 permutations) and a secondary threshold of P ϭ .05 were used to choose the significant components. [24][25][26] This method effectively controls for false-positives due to multiple comparisons.…”
Section: Network-based Statisticmentioning
confidence: 99%