2001
DOI: 10.1210/mend.15.6.0647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disrupted Amino- and Carboxyl-Terminal Interactions of the Androgen Receptor Are Linked to Androgen Insensitivity

Abstract: We have compared the functional consequences of seven single-point mutations in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the androgen receptor (AR). The mutations span helices 3 to 11 and are present in patients suffering from androgen insensitivity syndromes (AIS) and other male-specific disorders. The mutants, except M742V, bound to androgen response elements in vivo and in vitro and showed a testosterone-dependent conformational change. With regard to functional activity, the mutant M742V had severely blunted abi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the AR AF-2 is deemed to be the target site for the AR N-terminal WXXLF and FXXLF motifs, which show high affinity binding to the AF-2 domain and is necessary for the N-C interaction (35), suggests potential competition between the three motifs for AR interaction. Indeed, our finding 2 that Tip60 fails to interact with the AR LBD G743V mutant, which has been shown to abolish N-C interaction in the full-length AR context (36), may indicate that Tip60 binds to a site within the LBD that is also required for TD interaction. However, the rapid androgen dissociation kinetics associated with several AR LBD mutants (36) may have distorted our results, such that the failure for a Tip60 interaction may be due to the LBD being in the un-liganded, apo form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Considering that the AR AF-2 is deemed to be the target site for the AR N-terminal WXXLF and FXXLF motifs, which show high affinity binding to the AF-2 domain and is necessary for the N-C interaction (35), suggests potential competition between the three motifs for AR interaction. Indeed, our finding 2 that Tip60 fails to interact with the AR LBD G743V mutant, which has been shown to abolish N-C interaction in the full-length AR context (36), may indicate that Tip60 binds to a site within the LBD that is also required for TD interaction. However, the rapid androgen dissociation kinetics associated with several AR LBD mutants (36) may have distorted our results, such that the failure for a Tip60 interaction may be due to the LBD being in the un-liganded, apo form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We measured the strength of the interaction between each compound and the receptor in competitive binding studies, whereas the ability of the ligand to confer the appropriate conformation for cofactor recruitment was measured in the TRAF2 GRIP-1 assay. The N-terminal domain of AR contains a ligand-independent activator function (AF-1) but also functions largely as ligand-dependent cofactor for the LBD, a function that we postulated, based on human genetic data, functions in reproductive physiology (25)(26)(27)38). This receptor function was monitored in the VIRCON mammalian two-hybrid assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AR is maximally active when the ligand promotes an interaction between the N-and C-terminal AR domains (the N/C interaction). Interestingly, mutations in the N-or C-terminal domain of AR that impair this interaction were found in incompletely virilized patients with partial androgen insensitivity; some of these mutations also inhibit the recruitment of transcriptional cofactors to AF-2 (25)(26)(27). These genetic data suggest that synthetic ligands that promote the transactivation activity of AR while exhibiting reduced ability to support the N/C interaction or cofactor recruitment could provide tissue selectivity in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transactivation functions reside mainly in the ARTAD, and very minimal activity can be demonstrated in the ARLBD (2,3). Unlike other steroid receptors, transactivity depends on ligand-induced interactions between the ARTAD and ARLBD, and mutations that reduce TAD-LBD interactions affect AR activity, causing androgen insensitivity syndromes (4)(5)(6). Like other transcription regulators, the promoter-bound AR serves as a nidus to recruit cofactors that up-regulate (coactivators) or down-regulate (corepressors) AR activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%