2018
DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1484854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disputes in time bar provisions for contractors’ claims in standard form of contracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, to deal with rework causes within the contractual provisions, the overall idea is around the Engineer's role. The Engineer must take appropriate action when there is a consequent issue such as a delay (Seneviratne and Michael, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, to deal with rework causes within the contractual provisions, the overall idea is around the Engineer's role. The Engineer must take appropriate action when there is a consequent issue such as a delay (Seneviratne and Michael, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, findings suggest the occurrence of situations where standard forms are replaced with bespoke contracts. However, the use of bespoke arrangements is not encouraged by the participants, implying that their relative preference is a standard form, which is justified as an attempt to avoid any disputes that can emerge from a bespoke contract's discrepancies (Seneviratne and Michael, 2020). Nonetheless, one of the drivers of using bespoke contracts is clients' tendency to request the same, an aspect linked to minimising risks when doing business with new suppliers (Thompson et al, 1998).…”
Section: Standard Vs Bespoke Forms Of Contractsmentioning
confidence: 99%