2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/bloc.2019.8751312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispute Resolution for Smart Contract-based Two-Party Protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• In order to incentivise both parties to act honestly and prevent grieving, we incorporate fees into the dispute resolution sub-protocol. • We implemented the OptiSwap protocol and improved it using the technique introduces by SmartJudge [20] in order to estimate the gas costs 1 . The obtained values are compared against the original FairSwap protocol.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…• In order to incentivise both parties to act honestly and prevent grieving, we incorporate fees into the dispute resolution sub-protocol. • We implemented the OptiSwap protocol and improved it using the technique introduces by SmartJudge [20] in order to estimate the gas costs 1 . The obtained values are compared against the original FairSwap protocol.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimistic mode. The SmartJudge architecture was proposed by Wagner et al in 2019 [20]. It provides an abstraction of a two-party protocol that relies on the execution of a smart contract in case of dispute.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Shafagh et al [21] show how homomorphically encrypted data can be exchanged securely. Wagner et al [22] propose an approach to exchange digital goods based on mediator smart contracts, which enable dispute resolution. This work provides the means for decentralized exchange of CTI with smart contracts, but does not provide a browsable platform or quality assurance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%