2021
DOI: 10.1177/13540661211045112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispute inflation

Abstract: Much work has examined the phenomenon of dispute escalation, whereby the concrete measures state actors take edge them closer to war. Less attention has been devoted to the ways in which state actors’ perceptions of what is at stake in a dispute can also change, with important consequences for the likelihood of conflict. This paper examines the phenomenon of dispute inflation – wherein a contest over an object or issue assumes ever greater stakes and significance for its protagonists – and identifies three dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because anger promotes deontological thinking, where actions adhere to moral rules rather than consequences (García-Ponce, Young, and Zeitzoff 2023). Angry individuals may prioritize "nonmaterial stakes" and be willing to forgo material gains to ensure wrongdoers face repercussions (Hall 2021). This behavior is evident in ultimatum bargaining games where unfair yet materially beneficial offers are often rejected, a tendency that is reduced when anger is mitigated (Pillutla and Keith Murnighan 1996;Srivastava, Espinoza, and Fedorikhin 2009).…”
Section: Formalizing Angermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because anger promotes deontological thinking, where actions adhere to moral rules rather than consequences (García-Ponce, Young, and Zeitzoff 2023). Angry individuals may prioritize "nonmaterial stakes" and be willing to forgo material gains to ensure wrongdoers face repercussions (Hall 2021). This behavior is evident in ultimatum bargaining games where unfair yet materially beneficial offers are often rejected, a tendency that is reduced when anger is mitigated (Pillutla and Keith Murnighan 1996;Srivastava, Espinoza, and Fedorikhin 2009).…”
Section: Formalizing Angermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A closer examination of how fear was framed in China and the USA toward the other can enhance a better understanding of realism and constructivism. For example, the uncertainty of the other’s intentions would exacerbate the security dilemma, intensifying the military arms race (Lebow 2006 ; Hall 2021 ). Moreover, the changing power distribution and status ranking easily lead to fear for other countries, as the perceived weakness provides incentives for conquering and domination from the neighboring countries.…”
Section: Fear In International Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%