2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disproportionate impairment in semantic verbal fluency in schizophrenia: differential deficit in clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
62
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
62
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6,12,13 Semantic categorizations are used more frequently because they are based on meaning. Bokat & Goldberg 12 suggest that this makes the semantic task easier than the phonetic task because categorizations are rehearsed more often and require less controlled processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6,12,13 Semantic categorizations are used more frequently because they are based on meaning. Bokat & Goldberg 12 suggest that this makes the semantic task easier than the phonetic task because categorizations are rehearsed more often and require less controlled processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 One way of assessing verbal fluency is to measure two cognitive strategies commonly used by examinees, namely clustering (producing words within clusters or categories) and switching (ability to successfully switch between these clusters or categories). [6][7][8] In patients with SZ, only the switching component of phonemic fluency has been found to be impaired 9 ; however, assessment of semantic fluency revealed that both switching and clustering were affected 8 as compared to healthy controls (HC). Nonetheless, when the total word output was considered, patients and HC appeared to employ the same cognitive strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations