2019
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispositional negativity, cognition, and anxiety disorders: An integrative translational neuroscience framework

Abstract: When extreme, anxiety can become debilitating. Anxiety disorders, which often first emerge early in development, are common and challenging to treat, yet the underlying mechanisms have only recently begun to come into focus. Here, we review new insights into the nature and biological bases of dispositional negativity, a fundamental dimension of childhood temperament and adult personality and a prominent risk factor for the development of pediatric and adult anxiety disorders. Converging lines of epidemiologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 531 publications
(700 reference statements)
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most extreme subgroups likely constitute a risk cluster and a resilient cluster, respectively, characterized by high vs. low mean fear response and strong vs. weak fear generalization plus high vs. low levels of anxiety traits. However, regarding the well-established link between anxiety traits and the risk for anxiety disorders 55 , it seems that the behavioral phenotype and the psychometrically assessed phenotype are relatively independent at least in healthy individuals and should be considered as two separable risk factors for the development of pathological forms of fear and anxiety. Our results further emphasize that the group characteristics explaining most variance, i.e., increased mean fear responses and reduced CS-differentiation, are already evident during fear conditioning, a finding challenging the assumed unique importance of overgeneralization as a crucial risk factor for anxiety disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most extreme subgroups likely constitute a risk cluster and a resilient cluster, respectively, characterized by high vs. low mean fear response and strong vs. weak fear generalization plus high vs. low levels of anxiety traits. However, regarding the well-established link between anxiety traits and the risk for anxiety disorders 55 , it seems that the behavioral phenotype and the psychometrically assessed phenotype are relatively independent at least in healthy individuals and should be considered as two separable risk factors for the development of pathological forms of fear and anxiety. Our results further emphasize that the group characteristics explaining most variance, i.e., increased mean fear responses and reduced CS-differentiation, are already evident during fear conditioning, a finding challenging the assumed unique importance of overgeneralization as a crucial risk factor for anxiety disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 and difficulties disengaging from them 24,25 . This attentional bias towards threat has further been implicated in the maintenance of anxiety disorders (as reviewed in 26 ). A meta-analysis on attentional biases towards pain confirmed that healthy participants and chronic pain patients show heightened attention towards impending pain signals 27 suggesting a potential relationship between gaze patterns, commonly interpreted as markers of attention, and threat-related cues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these scar models argue that increases in NA across time lead to subsequent cognitive decline in systems involved in processing (i.e., processing speed, verbal WM, and spatial cognition; Wilson, Begeny, Boyle, Schneider, & Bennett, 2011). Moreover, developmental psychopathology models (Hur, Stockbridge, Fox, & Shackman, 2019) postulate that increases in cognitive dysfunction relate to future increases in NA throughout life. Taken together, change in NA and change in cognitive functioning could be inversely associated across sequential time periods encompassing long durations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%