1986
DOI: 10.1097/00007691-198606000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disposition of Cefotaxime and its Desacetyl Metabolite in Morbidly Obese Male and Female Subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the MICs of cefotiam for most strains of clinically isolated E. coli, S. aulreuls, K. pnelimoniae, H. influenzae, and P. mirabilis are within a range of 0.2 to 0.78 pLg/ml (10), the pharmacokinetics of cefotiam described in this study suggest that an intraveneous dose of 1 g x (BSA/1.7 m2) and 2 g x (BSA/1.7 m2) infused over 30 min in the obese patient group would produce respective concentrations in plasma of greater than 0.78 p.g/ml (with respective peaks of 52.0 ± 10.7 and 103.9 ± 21.4 p.g/ml) for 3.72 ± 0.63 and 4.65 + 0.58 h after the infusion began and therefore would readily inhibit these bacterial pathogens for at least approximately 3.7 and 4.7 h, respectively. These values predicted from the mean disposition data in the sumo wrestler patient group are comparable to the respective values calculated after a 1-g dose (3.54 + 0.54 h) and actually observed after a 2-g dose of cefotiam (4. (21) describing cefotaxime kinetics in morbidly obese subjects. They found that kinetic parameters of cefotaxime in morbidly obese subjects can be compensated for if the parameters are corrected for BSA and recommended that a dosage adjustment of cefotaxime should be made on the basis of BSA (21).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the MICs of cefotiam for most strains of clinically isolated E. coli, S. aulreuls, K. pnelimoniae, H. influenzae, and P. mirabilis are within a range of 0.2 to 0.78 pLg/ml (10), the pharmacokinetics of cefotiam described in this study suggest that an intraveneous dose of 1 g x (BSA/1.7 m2) and 2 g x (BSA/1.7 m2) infused over 30 min in the obese patient group would produce respective concentrations in plasma of greater than 0.78 p.g/ml (with respective peaks of 52.0 ± 10.7 and 103.9 ± 21.4 p.g/ml) for 3.72 ± 0.63 and 4.65 + 0.58 h after the infusion began and therefore would readily inhibit these bacterial pathogens for at least approximately 3.7 and 4.7 h, respectively. These values predicted from the mean disposition data in the sumo wrestler patient group are comparable to the respective values calculated after a 1-g dose (3.54 + 0.54 h) and actually observed after a 2-g dose of cefotiam (4. (21) describing cefotaxime kinetics in morbidly obese subjects. They found that kinetic parameters of cefotaxime in morbidly obese subjects can be compensated for if the parameters are corrected for BSA and recommended that a dosage adjustment of cefotaxime should be made on the basis of BSA (21).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values predicted from the mean disposition data in the sumo wrestler patient group are comparable to the respective values calculated after a 1-g dose (3.54 + 0.54 h) and actually observed after a 2-g dose of cefotiam (4. (21) describing cefotaxime kinetics in morbidly obese subjects. They found that kinetic parameters of cefotaxime in morbidly obese subjects can be compensated for if the parameters are corrected for BSA and recommended that a dosage adjustment of cefotaxime should be made on the basis of BSA (21). The correlation of our findings with those of Yost and Derendorf may come from the similar physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of cefotiam and cefotaxime, since both cephalosporins have a common chemical structure (6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of altered body composition on drug disposition and therapeutic outcome with increasing obesity is particularly pertinent in antimicrobial therapy. Suboptimal drug exposure can lead to clinical failure and increase the risk of drug resistance.Several studies that specifically examined drug disposition of ␤-lactam antibiotics in obesity found an increase in the volume of distribution and/or drug clearance in obese subjects (3,12,24). This suggests that such patients may require higher doses or more frequent administration in order to achieve adequate drug exposure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies that specifically examined drug disposition of ␤-lactam antibiotics in obesity found an increase in the volume of distribution and/or drug clearance in obese subjects (3,12,24). This suggests that such patients may require higher doses or more frequent administration in order to achieve adequate drug exposure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is magnified for lipophilic medications, which tend to more readily distribute than hydrophilic drugs. Previous work has identified larger V d in obese patients for most classes of antimicrobial agents, including penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, vancomycin, and others [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The extent to which a medication is protein-bound also affects V d , and obesity has been shown to alter lipoproteins and alpha1-acid glycoprotein [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%