2006
DOI: 10.1080/08878730609555385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disposition assessment in teacher education: A framework and instrument for assessing technology disposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Willis and Mehlinger (1996) also noted studies that found completion of a course on educational computing improves attitudes toward technology in the classroom of inservice teachers (Baird, Ellis, & Kuerbis, 1989;Berger & Carlson, 1988;Madsen & Subastiani, 1987) and preservice teachers (Anderson, 1991;Huppert & Lazarowitz, 1991;Savenye, Davidson, & Orr, 1992). Other more recent studies support these findings as well (Albion, 2001;Brinkeroff, 2006;Ertmer, Addison, Lane, Ross, & Woods, 1999;Gunter, Gunter, & Wiens, 1998;Jung, Rhodes, & Vogt, 2006;Kumar & Kumar, 2003;Milbrath & Kinzie, 2000;Nanjappa & Lowther, 2004;Okinaka, 1992;Richardson-Kemp & Yan, 2003;Stuve & Cassady, 2005;Wang, Ertmer, & Newby, 2004;Watson, 2006;Yildirim, 2000).…”
Section: Preservice Teacher Education Students' Attitudes Toward Techmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Willis and Mehlinger (1996) also noted studies that found completion of a course on educational computing improves attitudes toward technology in the classroom of inservice teachers (Baird, Ellis, & Kuerbis, 1989;Berger & Carlson, 1988;Madsen & Subastiani, 1987) and preservice teachers (Anderson, 1991;Huppert & Lazarowitz, 1991;Savenye, Davidson, & Orr, 1992). Other more recent studies support these findings as well (Albion, 2001;Brinkeroff, 2006;Ertmer, Addison, Lane, Ross, & Woods, 1999;Gunter, Gunter, & Wiens, 1998;Jung, Rhodes, & Vogt, 2006;Kumar & Kumar, 2003;Milbrath & Kinzie, 2000;Nanjappa & Lowther, 2004;Okinaka, 1992;Richardson-Kemp & Yan, 2003;Stuve & Cassady, 2005;Wang, Ertmer, & Newby, 2004;Watson, 2006;Yildirim, 2000).…”
Section: Preservice Teacher Education Students' Attitudes Toward Techmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Even though some of the more current studies expand upon previous findings on teachers' self-efficacy and technology (Stuve & Cassady, 2005;Wang et al, 2004;Watson, 2006), other studies provide a more complex picture about teachers' perceptions of technology. For example, several researchers examine the relationship between technology and teachers' beliefs (Albion & Ertmer, 2002;Ertmer, 2005;Judson, 2006;Levin & Wadmany, 2006;Lumpe & Chambers, 2001;Swain, 2006), as well as the assessment and influence of dispositions vis-á-vis technology (Jung et al, 2006;Vannatta & Fordham, 2004). In general, these studies show that although self-efficacy plays a large role in the degree to which technology is utilized, they also demonstrate that factors such as owning a computer, quality of instruction, among several others, are often just as important as one's confidence in using technology.…”
Section: Preservice Teacher Education Students' Attitudes Toward Techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, behaviors do not necessarily result from dispositions. However, the idea behind dispositions is that they can be used to predict future trends in behavior (Jung et al, 2006). For example, a teacher who possesses a high level of technology disposition in teaching mathematics is more likely to use it in his or her pedagogical decisions.…”
Section: The Framework Of Technology Dispositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus in the related literature regarding what constitutes technology competence. For instance, being adaptable to change could be a sign of technological proficiency (Jung et al, 2006). Chai et al (2013) describe technology competence as teachers’ self-efficacy (perceptions of their knowledge and skills).…”
Section: The Framework Of Technology Dispositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholarly and professional discussions related to the nature and acquisition of dispositional outcomes for teacher and leader candidates have increased significantly in the last several years (e.g., Damon, 2005; Hillman et al , 2006; Jung et al , 2006; Maylone, 2002; Schussler, 2006). As identified in the introductory section of this paper, the impetus for such sustained dialogue may be attributed, in part, to professional and accrediting organizations' expectations for teacher education programs to cultivate and document appropriate professional dispositions in teacher and leader candidates.…”
Section: Dispositions and Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%