2023
DOI: 10.1163/19606028-bja10029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disposal constructions in Chaoshan Southern Min

Abstract: This study examines the use of various types of disposal constructions in the Chenghai dialect of Chaoshan Southern Min. Based on the distinction between head-marking and dependent-marking grammar, we identify four types of disposal constructions, depending on the position of the marker. We performed the fruit cart task to elicit disposal constructions from 30 native speakers of this dialect. Our results indicate that zero-marking is the most dominant construction type, where topicalization represents the most… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we mentioned in Section 4.7, Hui Chinese varieties commonly employ two pretransitive disposal markers of different lexical sources, with Haiyang Hui representing the most extreme case, where three different disposal markers are used. While this is a rare phenomenon in Sinitic languages as a whole, the co-existence of three or more disposal markers is pervasive in the Chaoshan subgroup of Southern Min, whose division of labor appears to be conditioned by certain semantic and pragmatic factors (Lin and Szeto 2023). Given the multiple lexical sources of disposal markers in Hui Chinese, it holds promise to investigate the functional range of these markers and analyze whether it is affected by their lexical sources (and hence grammaticalization pathways).…”
Section: Multiple Lexical Sources Of Pretransitive Disposal Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we mentioned in Section 4.7, Hui Chinese varieties commonly employ two pretransitive disposal markers of different lexical sources, with Haiyang Hui representing the most extreme case, where three different disposal markers are used. While this is a rare phenomenon in Sinitic languages as a whole, the co-existence of three or more disposal markers is pervasive in the Chaoshan subgroup of Southern Min, whose division of labor appears to be conditioned by certain semantic and pragmatic factors (Lin and Szeto 2023). Given the multiple lexical sources of disposal markers in Hui Chinese, it holds promise to investigate the functional range of these markers and analyze whether it is affected by their lexical sources (and hence grammaticalization pathways).…”
Section: Multiple Lexical Sources Of Pretransitive Disposal Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%