The performance of a newly designed corner impinging jet air distribution method with an equilateral triangle cross section was evaluated experimentally and compared to that of two more traditional methods (mixing and displacement ventilation). At nine evenly chosen positions with four standard vertical points, air velocity, turbulence intensity, temperature, and tracer gas decay measurements were conducted for all systems. The results show that the new method behaves as a displacement ventilation system, with high air change effectiveness and stratified flow pattern and temperature field. Both local air change effectiveness and air exchange effectiveness of the corner impinging jet showed high quality and promising results, which is a good indicator of ventilation effectiveness. The results also indicate that there is a possibility to slightly lower the airflow rates for the new air distribution system, while still meeting the requirements for thermal comfort and indoor air quality, thereby reducing fan energy usage. The draught rate was also lower for corner impinging jet compared to the other tested air distribution methods. The findings of this research show that the corner impinging jet method can be used for office ventilation.Energies 2019, 12, 1354 2 of 15 the average IAQ in the occupied zone, and the results showed that there was a 35-50% improvement in the breathing zone due to the buoyancy effect around the mannequin body [4]. In a more recent publication, four different ventilation systems were compared in terms of ventilation efficiency, thermal comfort and energy-saving potential by using numerical simulations. The four systems compared were DV, mixing ventilation (MV), wall confluent jets ventilation (WCJ), and impinging jet ventilation (IJV). The comparison was done for an office environment. The results showed that DV was better than the other air delivery systems in all areas except when evaluating the vertical temperature gradient between ankle and neck levels for a standing person [5]. Other research groups have also concluded that DV is more suitable for cooling by exhibiting higher ventilation and energy effectiveness. It also creates a temperature stratification which facilitates the concentration of pollutants in the lower strata of the occupied space [6][7][8].Another type of air distribution system is IJV, which has been the subject of much research [9-13]. However, very few studies have examined multiple inlet devices based on IJV. In an early study, Karimipanah and Awbi [14] compared IJV to wall displacement ventilation in a laboratory classroom. They tested several key parameters such as ventilation efficiency, local mean age of air, and other characteristic parameters both experimentally and by numerical simulations. One of the conclusions of their research was that the IJV system showed a slight improvement in mean age of air and velocity distributions due to a better balance between buoyancy and momentum forces. Similarly, Koufi et al. [15] also reached the conclusion that IJV ha...