Minimally invasive implantology has gained popularity in recent years. 1 This popularity could be related to improvements in the surface and design of the implants and to the development of minimally invasive surgical techniques that preserve, at most, the residual alveolar bone. 2,3 The use of short implants could be an alternative to bone augmentation surgery. Short (length #8 mm) implants have been shown to have high survival rates and have resulted in 3 times fewer intraoperative complications compared with long implants. 4 Different meta-analysis studies have found similar implant and prosthesis survival rates for short dental implants and standard implants placed in vertically augmented bone. 5,6 Short dental implants may be the preferred treatment in atrophic alveolar bone, as they have been associated with lower biological complications and decreased morbidity, costs, and surgical times. 4,7 There are 2 types of implant surgery: a 1-stage surgery in which the implant and a transmucosal abutment are placed in the same surgery (nonsubmerged healing) and a 2-stage surgery in which the implant and the abutment are placed in 2 different surgical interventions (submerged healing). [8][9][10][11] Submerged healing enables implant osseointegration, and it protects the implant from excessive micromovements. 8,9 Nonsubmerged healing is less invasive and shortens the time of implant loading and prosthesis delivery. 10,11 However, it is important to avoid implant micromovements that exceed 150 mm due to the detrimental effect on implant osseointegration and the increase in the risk of early implant failure. [12][13][14][15] The high life expectancy at birth and the longevity of our patients indicate that dental implants work for an increased time. However, there is a paucity of clinical studies that have assessed the long-term prognosis of short dental implants. There have been few studies with a follow-up time longer than 10 years. [16][17][18] The purpose of the study was to assess the long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting fixed complete prostheses and the effect of the