1956
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.27.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displacement in Figural After Effects and Simultaneous Illusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contour repulsions obtained are given in Figure 4. A comparison with an experiment in which the figures were presented successively (Pollack, 1958) suggests a close correspondence of the two sets of results (see also Ikeda & Obonai, 1955;Ikuta, 1956;Logan, 1960;Nozawa, 1953).…”
Section: Fig 2 a Stimulus Configuration Used Bymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The contour repulsions obtained are given in Figure 4. A comparison with an experiment in which the figures were presented successively (Pollack, 1958) suggests a close correspondence of the two sets of results (see also Ikeda & Obonai, 1955;Ikuta, 1956;Logan, 1960;Nozawa, 1953).…”
Section: Fig 2 a Stimulus Configuration Used Bymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The relations between illusions and figural aftereffects have been discussed by several authors (e.g., Adam, 1966; Ganz, 1966a, 1966b; Hochberg, 1971; Logan, 1962, cited in Day, 1969; Oyama, 1960; Pollack, 1967). Many experimental studies relevant to this problem have been made by Japanese researchers (e.g., Ikeda & Obonai, 1955a, 1955b; Ikuta, 1956; Suto, 1961). Situations have been designed that make it possible to study illusions, aftereffects, and TOEs by varying the temporal and spatial relations between three stimulus figures—inspection (In), test (Tt), and Co.…”
Section: Earlier Toe Research and Theories: A Selective Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%