2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2019.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 A third prominent case is the Partition of India in 1947 which triggered massive population exchanges between India and Pakistan. Focusing on the agricultural sector, Bharadwaj and Mirza (2019) demonstrate that areas in India that received more refugees have (1) higher average yields, (2) are more likely to take up high-yielding varieties of seeds, and (3) are more likely to use agricultural technologies. These effects are not explained by selective movement into districts with a higher potential for agricultural development.…”
Section: Productivity and Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 A third prominent case is the Partition of India in 1947 which triggered massive population exchanges between India and Pakistan. Focusing on the agricultural sector, Bharadwaj and Mirza (2019) demonstrate that areas in India that received more refugees have (1) higher average yields, (2) are more likely to take up high-yielding varieties of seeds, and (3) are more likely to use agricultural technologies. These effects are not explained by selective movement into districts with a higher potential for agricultural development.…”
Section: Productivity and Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third prominent case is the Partition of India in 1947 which triggered massive population exchanges between India and Pakistan. Focusing on the agricultural sector, Bharadwaj and Mirza (2019) demonstrate that areas in India that received more refugees have (1) higher average yields, (2) are more likely to take up high‐yielding varieties of seeds, and (3) are more likely to use agricultural technologies. These effects are not explained by selective movement into districts with a higher potential for agricultural development.…”
Section: Consequences Of Forced Migration For Receiving Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our first novel contribution is to demonstrate that the positive historical legacy of high-skilled groups can trump any negative effect these regions might have experienced. Related literature highlights the effects of expulsions and persecutions on social structure, labor market outcomes and education (Acemoglu et al, 2011;Becker et al, 2020;Testa, 2021;Bharadwaj et al, 2015), agricultural productivity (Bazzi et al, 2016;Bharadwaj & Mirza, 2019), population dynamics (Chaney & Hornbeck, 2016), firm performance (Huber et al, 2021), financial development (Pascali, 2016), and scientific productivity (Waldinger, 2012(Waldinger, , 2016Akbulut-Yuksel & Yuksel, 2015). We depart from this literature as we are not concerned with isolating the effects of expulsions per se.…”
Section: Contribution To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%