2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displaced medial clavicle fractures: a systematic review of outcomes after nonoperative and operative management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the non-operative group (5 studies, 39 patients, mean follow-up of 27 months) there were 5 symptomatic non-unions, 2 malunions and 2 delayed unions. In the surgical group (11 studies, 96 patients, mean follow-up 23 months) there were no reported non-unions, but 27 % of the operated patients required hardware removal [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussion Review Of the Literature And Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the non-operative group (5 studies, 39 patients, mean follow-up of 27 months) there were 5 symptomatic non-unions, 2 malunions and 2 delayed unions. In the surgical group (11 studies, 96 patients, mean follow-up 23 months) there were no reported non-unions, but 27 % of the operated patients required hardware removal [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussion Review Of the Literature And Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of orthopedic surgery, clavicle fractures are a common injury that often requires surgical intervention for proper healing [1]. The clavicle has three parts: body (or diaphysis), sternal end (or medial epiphysis), and acromial end (or lateral epiphysis) [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, recent studies have shown that non-operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures leads to poorer outcomes than surgical treatment [27,28]. Secondly, advances in surgical techniques and a better understanding of the fracture type have contributed to the increasing preference for surgical management [1]. In addition, plate fixation offers biomechanical advantages, including greater stiffness and flexural strength compared to intramedullary fixation [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%