2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 60-69 years old – treatment and patient reported outcomes in a register cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response rate is monitored continuously on the website at unit level and ranges from approximately 65% as its best at injury time and 15% as the lowest at 1 year, depending on age group, fracture type and department. Studies evaluating PROM results and response rates in the SFR are ongoing, but only a few have so far been published [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response rate is monitored continuously on the website at unit level and ranges from approximately 65% as its best at injury time and 15% as the lowest at 1 year, depending on age group, fracture type and department. Studies evaluating PROM results and response rates in the SFR are ongoing, but only a few have so far been published [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HHS is a commonly used index to evaluate the postoperative function of patients with femoral neck fractures. Postoperative HHS has been statistically significant in many meta-analyses [ 3 , 4 , 11 ]. In a study by Gao et al [ 51 ], the HHS of patients undergoing joint replacement was generally higher than that of patients treated with internal fixations, which is consistent with the meta-analysis of Burgers et al [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, some patients may achieve satisfactory results as long as they are treated with IF.Their study demonstrates that patients undergoing THA had higher in hospital complication rates and longer length of stay than patients undergoing IF. The in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing a hip hemiarthroplasty(HA) was higher (1.2%) than either THA (0.2%) or IF (0.5%).Two studies of nondisplaced FNF patients over the age of 70 found that among patients receiving IF and the arthroplasty, patients treated with arthroplasty had higher 30-days mortality rate(11%)( 16) and patients treated with internal xation have a higher 2-year mortality rate(36%) (17).Several studies have shown that IF may be more cost-effective than hip arthroplasty because the total cost is less (15,18,19).Lagergrenet et al (20)reported that HA with baseline results in patient reported outcome measure indicating poorer health and function, as well as higher mortality and lower response rates with patients aged 60-69.IF tend to fail in up to 1/3 of the cases but can offer the bene ts of a biologically intact hip if successful.In young elderly people, it is still worth for doctors to choose IF to preserve the native hip joint among the appropriate fracture types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%