2016
DOI: 10.1049/joe.2016.0174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersive delay lines using microstrip technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the comparisons of the prototype dimensions and performance between the proposed DDL and other recently published works. It can be summarized that the proposed DDL has the smallest electric size without compromising the performance, which is only 6.2%, 10.3%, and 11.6% in area compared with the ones in [10,11] and [12], respectively. Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 shows the comparisons of the prototype dimensions and performance between the proposed DDL and other recently published works. It can be summarized that the proposed DDL has the smallest electric size without compromising the performance, which is only 6.2%, 10.3%, and 11.6% in area compared with the ones in [10,11] and [12], respectively. Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third slot line is a coupling line for fine-tuning the S-parameters through adjusting the distance between the coupling line and the complementary slot lines. Compared with the conventional DDL with microstrip line technology, the length of the complementary slot line of the proposed DDL is only about λ g /4, rather than around λ g /2 in [10][11][12]. The reason for the length reduction can be explained as that the upper end is opened and the lower end shorted for the proposed complementary slot line, while both ends are shorted for the conventional complementary slot lines.…”
Section: Design Of the Ddlmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations