2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.07.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion stability of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in catanionic surfactant mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The much smaller fraction of active laccase indicates that substantial amounts of laccase were inactivated by the reaction with As (III). As the reaction sites of laccase were coppers, a dialysis tube with 3 kDa molecular weight cutoff was utilized to detect the concentration of copper released during the reaction, 42 and it was found that neither protein nor laccase activity was detected in any of the filtrates. Figure 3A presents copper concentrations measured in the filtrates of solutions that had experienced reactions at different time, and its concentration increased to 33.8 ± 2.35 μg L −1 with the reaction time.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The much smaller fraction of active laccase indicates that substantial amounts of laccase were inactivated by the reaction with As (III). As the reaction sites of laccase were coppers, a dialysis tube with 3 kDa molecular weight cutoff was utilized to detect the concentration of copper released during the reaction, 42 and it was found that neither protein nor laccase activity was detected in any of the filtrates. Figure 3A presents copper concentrations measured in the filtrates of solutions that had experienced reactions at different time, and its concentration increased to 33.8 ± 2.35 μg L −1 with the reaction time.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, dispersions were prepared by mixing 125 mg of graphite powder in 25 mL of aqueous solutions containing the abovementioned concentrations of the surfactants. The as-prepared dispersions were stirred for 15 h using a magnetic stirrer (model, MS-MP8) and then sonicated for 5 h using an ultrasonic cleaner set (model, WUC-D10H) at an average power of 100 W. To reduce the effect of increasing temperature that can cause chemical degradation during the sonication process, the temperature was kept within a range of 25–30 °C using an ice bath . Next, the dispersions were centrifuged for 10 min at 10 000 rpm (Heal Force, model Neofuge 15) to remove most of the larger flakes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All resulting aqueous solutions were sonicated for 1 h with an ultrasonic homogenizer (Bandelin Sonopuls® UW2200) with active intervals of 0.1 s, passive intervals of 0.9 s, amplitude fixed at 50% and a power equals to 200 W. Subsequently, the solutions were centrifuged for 5 min at 2680 g0 in order to bring bundles as well as residual catalyst particles to the bottom of the centrifuge tubes [17], [19], [25], [27], [36]. The supernatants were selected and further characterized.…”
Section: Dispersion Of Mwnt In Various Surfactants Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%