1975
DOI: 10.4098/at.arch.75-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion of young bank voles from their place of birth

Abstract: The effect of population density and the quality of the habitat in the animals' place of birth on the distance and direction in which the young disperse was studied. The material used for analysis was obtained during the period 1968-1971 from individual marking of bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus (S c h r e b e r, 1780) on an island 4 ha in extent, during the period of life in the nest. It was found that the distance covered by the animals in dispersing is in inverse proportion to the density of the whole po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). These estimates are similar to those of C. glareolus (males 62.7 m, females 48.6 m; Mazurkiewicz and Rajska 1975). In the population, 51.2% of females settled within one home range length from the natal site, and 22.0% settled further than two range lengths, while only 24.8% of males settled within one home range length from the natal site, and 51.2% dispersed further than two range lengths (Saitoh 1995).…”
Section: Sexual Difference In Dispersal Patternssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…3). These estimates are similar to those of C. glareolus (males 62.7 m, females 48.6 m; Mazurkiewicz and Rajska 1975). In the population, 51.2% of females settled within one home range length from the natal site, and 22.0% settled further than two range lengths, while only 24.8% of males settled within one home range length from the natal site, and 51.2% dispersed further than two range lengths (Saitoh 1995).…”
Section: Sexual Difference In Dispersal Patternssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some o f them might have died but most o f them probably dispersed. Dispersers commonly are maturing young (Watts 1970, Mazurkiewicz and Rajska-Jurgiel 1975, Bujalska and Grum 1989, 1995, Gliwicz 1989, Rajska-Jurgiel 1992, Stenseth and Lidicker 1992, Viitalae/aZ. 1994, Plesner Jensen 1996.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The " trap-shyness" and the later captures o f juveniles may be an effect o f gradual changes in home ranges and the dependence on mothers and external food resources. Yet, we know that only few o f them mature near the natal site (Watts 1970, Mazurkiewicz and Rajska-Jurgiel 1975, Gliwicz 1989, Stenseth and Lidicker 1992, Rajska-Jurgiel 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High spring numbers of breeding females give rise to recruitment of large numbers of juveniles and rapid filling of vacant space early in the season. High densities of the year-born young inhibit their dispersal (Mazurkiewicz and Rajska 1975, Goundie and Vessey 1986. As a result of lack of vacant space and high site tenacity of residents, a chance for finding a place for breeding is small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More rodents abandoned their home ranges in the years of low than in the year of high density. In non-cyclic populations, the rate of dispersal is typically higher at low than at high densities (Mazurkiewicz and Rajska-Jurgiel 1975, Jannett 1978, Jones et al 1988, Wolff et al 1988, Bujalska and Griim 1989, Jones 1989, Wolff and Cicirello 1990, Hansson 1991, Chistova 1995, Lukyanov 1995, as a consequence of resource limitation as well as competition for mates or space to breed. Dispersal rates decline with increasing availability of resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%