1992
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(92)86016-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion of the third-order optical nonlinearity of C60. A third-harmonic generation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[b] Van Gisbergen et al [69] [c] Janšík et al [70] [d] This has been reported by Meth et al [71] and corrected for dispersion as described in refs. [72,73].…”
Section: Semiempirical Calculations Of the Second Hyperpolarizabilitymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[b] Van Gisbergen et al [69] [c] Janšík et al [70] [d] This has been reported by Meth et al [71] and corrected for dispersion as described in refs. [72,73].…”
Section: Semiempirical Calculations Of the Second Hyperpolarizabilitymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…2,3 Unfortunately this error seems to be quite indicative of the later development with numerous measurements using different techniques obtaining data for the hyperpolarizability of C 60 scattered between 10 Ϫ24 and 10 Ϫ35 esu, i.e., an indeterminacy of 11 orders of magnitude. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Such discrepancies reflect many different problems encountered in experimental measurements as discussed in Ref. 15 and as also commented below.…”
Section: Patrick Norman Yi Luo Dan Jonsson and Hans åGrenmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A value of (3) ϭ 4.1 Ϯ 0.6 ϫ 10 Ϫ12 esu measured relative to fused silica was found in a THG experiment at a frequency of 0.019 a.u. [75]. The reference value used was (3) ϭ 2.8 ϫ 10 Ϫ14 esu, but a more recent value of (3) ϭ 1.1 ϫ 10 Ϫ14 esu was found and believed to be more accurate [80,81].…”
Section: Macroscopic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%