2006
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.122622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion of repolarization and refractoriness are determinants of arrhythmia phenotype in transgenic mice with long QT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In congenital or acquired human LQTS, increased spatial dispersion of repolarization plays a major role in propagating and maintaining malignant arrhythmias (37,38), and EADs due to prolonged APD have been assumed to trigger these arrhythmias. Experimental models in transgenic mice have shown increased apexto-base dispersion of repolarization underlying mouse arrhythmias (17,39), and pharmacological LQT models in rabbits and dogs have reproduced this finding as transmural dispersion of repolarization in wedge preparations (40)(41)(42)(43). Studies in experimental models (43,44), in mathematical simulations (45,46), and in affected humans with LQTS (47) have demonstrated the occurrence of phase 2 and 3 EADs in vitro, in silico, and in vivo, hinting toward M cells and/or Purkinje fibers as the origin of EADs (44,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In congenital or acquired human LQTS, increased spatial dispersion of repolarization plays a major role in propagating and maintaining malignant arrhythmias (37,38), and EADs due to prolonged APD have been assumed to trigger these arrhythmias. Experimental models in transgenic mice have shown increased apexto-base dispersion of repolarization underlying mouse arrhythmias (17,39), and pharmacological LQT models in rabbits and dogs have reproduced this finding as transmural dispersion of repolarization in wedge preparations (40)(41)(42)(43). Studies in experimental models (43,44), in mathematical simulations (45,46), and in affected humans with LQTS (47) have demonstrated the occurrence of phase 2 and 3 EADs in vitro, in silico, and in vivo, hinting toward M cells and/or Purkinje fibers as the origin of EADs (44,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although AP prolongation underlying prolongation of the QT interval could promote reentrant arrhythmias through early afterdepolarizations (EADs) [as in Torsade de Pointes (53)], mice studies reveal that QT prolongation alone is not sufficient to create a proarrhythmic substrate and that gradients of refractoriness across the wall of the ventricle (epicardium to endocardium) as well as along the wall (base to apex) reflecting differential expression of ion channels (2,12,39) are critical to assess arrhythmia vulnerability (58). A most conspicuous example are Kv4.2DN dominant-negative TG mice, lacking a major repolarization current, the rapidly recovering component of I to .…”
Section: Differences In Aps and Ca 2ϩ Handling In Isolated Ventriculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A most conspicuous example are Kv4.2DN dominant-negative TG mice, lacking a major repolarization current, the rapidly recovering component of I to . These mice have a significant prolongation of AP in isolated myocytes and QT intervals in electrocardiogram recordings (5) but show an anti-arrhythmic phenotype due to uniform refractory periods along the epicardium (39). Our simulations confirmed a protective role for AP prolongation in TNF-␣-overexpressing mice: in the model tissue with TG AP and WT conductance, reentry was triggered in a smaller time window for S2 (ϳ0.01 ms) compared with WT tissue with normal AP and conduction (ϳ0.12 ms), and the resulting reentry was not sustained.…”
Section: Differences In Aps and Ca 2ϩ Handling In Isolated Ventriculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional differences in current densities 15 have been suggested to contribute to the native transmural repolarization gradient. 21 There were also marked regional differences in the cellular effects of LVH. The reduction in I peak densities was more pronounced in TAC EPI, than ENDO, LV myocytes in spite of the fact that meanϮSEM C m was higher in TAC ENDO cells (Figure 4A through 4C and the Table).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%