2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion-minimizing quadrature rules for C1 quadratic isogeometric analysis

Abstract: We develop quadrature rules for the isogeometric analysis of wave propagation and structural vibrations that minimize the discrete dispersion error of the approximation. The rules are optimal in the sense that they only require two quadrature points per element to minimize the dispersion error [8], and they are equivalent to the optimized blending rules we recently described. Our approach further simplifies the numerical integration: instead of blending two three-point standard quadrature rules, we construct d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost of the assembly of the tensor product matrix does not increase much even when we evaluate two quadrature rules instead of one when using the optimally-blended rules. Moreover, nonstandard quadrature rules (with a minimal number of quadrature points), which are equivalent to the optimally-blended quadrature rules in the sense of producing the same mass and stiffness matrices, are developed in [41] and they reduce computational cost; see also the p = 1 p = 2 p = 3 N λ reduced rules in [42].…”
Section: Computational Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of the assembly of the tensor product matrix does not increase much even when we evaluate two quadrature rules instead of one when using the optimally-blended rules. Moreover, nonstandard quadrature rules (with a minimal number of quadrature points), which are equivalent to the optimally-blended quadrature rules in the sense of producing the same mass and stiffness matrices, are developed in [41] and they reduce computational cost; see also the p = 1 p = 2 p = 3 N λ reduced rules in [42].…”
Section: Computational Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, reduced integration may minimize the numerical dispersion of the finite element and isogeometric analysis approximations. Higher accuracy can be obtained using optimal blending schemes (blending the Gauss and Lobatto quadratures [2,7,33]) or dispersion-minimizing quadrature rules, which can be constructed to produce equivalent results [4,20]. This dispersion-minimizing integration improves the convergence rate of the resulting eigenvalues by two orders when compared against the fully-integrated finite, spectral, or isogeometric elements, while preserving the optimal convergence of the eigenfunctions.…”
Section: Riga With Optimal Blendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, differential eigenvalue problems are solved by using standard FEMs (c.f., [8,11,16,17,[36][37][38]42]), isogeometric analysis (c.f., [19,29,30]), discontinuous Galerkin methods (c.f., [4,26,27]), etc. We are not going to expand the literature review here and only mention the most-recent quadrature rule blending techniques developed in [3] for FEMs and in [13,15,20,21,39] for isogeometric analysis. The optimally-blended rules developed in these papers lead to two extra orders of superconvergence for the eigenvalues while maintaining the optimal convergence rates for the eigenfunctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%