1962
DOI: 10.1016/0020-708x(62)90172-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion and persistence of tracer in river flow measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation developed by Hull et al (1958Hull et al ( ,1962) is shown in Fig. 4.1 as well as the measured values on which it is based.…”
Section: Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The correlation developed by Hull et al (1958Hull et al ( ,1962) is shown in Fig. 4.1 as well as the measured values on which it is based.…”
Section: Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Velocity differences are caused by the shear imparted to the fluid by the streambed and its associated roughness as well as superimposed random motions of the fluid that are turbulent. Hull (1962) developed an empirical correlation for the longitudinal dispersion coefficient 0, based on experimental measurements made in the South Fork of the American River and results obtained from earlier tests (Hull and Macomber 1958). The American River runs through a deep, rocky northern California gorge in which water is churned by rapids located several hundreds of meters (yards) apart.…”
Section: Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is seen that the error 5(r) is effectively zero after four times the mean residence time for the first distribution, and 1.5 times the mean residence time for the second case. The curves obtained by Hull (1962) suggest residence time distributions falling between the two examples. Figure 5 and Table 1 show the results of the calculation of e(t), the error due to changing discharge, using the hydrograph given by equation (11) and the gamma residence time distribution E(9) = aj 2 0exp(-co0)…”
Section: A Second Test Distribution Is Derived From the Normal (Gaussmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In mixing length studies transverse and vertical dispersion is important, whereas longitudinal dispersion is dominant in the problem of changing discharge. Hull (1962) is one of many authors who have used the theory of longitudinal dispersion in the analysis of tracer experiments. After an instantaneous injection of a radiotracer, gold-198, in a turbulent natural stream, he obtained curves of concentration against time at a series of downstream stations (Fig.…”
Section: The Residence Time Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%