2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2017.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersed decision-making system with fusion methods from the rank level and the measurement level – A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The set of classes that have the maximum value of similarity is the final decision. In this article, the Hamming distance is used, because based on previous experience [ 22 ] it produces the best results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of classes that have the maximum value of similarity is the final decision. In this article, the Hamming distance is used, because based on previous experience [ 22 ] it produces the best results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the evidence theory used in this paper, there exist many other fusion methods. Przybyła et al introduced four fusion methods from the rank level and nine from the measurement level and compared their experimental results [35]. They concluded that the Borda count method is the best method for producing definite results, followed by the sum rule and the product rule.…”
Section: B Collective Preference After Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• ψ SM -outputs of the linear classifiers were normalized using the softmax rule, and then combined according to (10).…”
Section: Design Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combining phase can be achieved using different types of the classifier's output: a class label [6], a subset of labels ordered by plausibility [10], a vector of all possible labels with corresponding scoring functions [11]. The scoring function may have a different nature depending on the type of individual learners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%