2018
DOI: 10.1101/485706
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersal syndromes can impact ecosystem functioning in spatially structured freshwater populations

Abstract: Dispersal can strongly influence ecological and evolutionary dynamics.Besides the direct contribution of dispersal to population dynamics, dispersers often differ in their phenotypic attributes from non-dispersers, which leads to dispersal syndromes. The consequences of such dispersal syndromes have been widely explored at the population and community level, however, to date, ecosystem-level effects remain unclear. Here, we examine whether dispersing and resident individuals of two different aquatic keystone i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used an experimental approach linking ecological and cell biology competencies to determine how innate and plastic changes to fine-scale cellular activities can impact the dispersal process. Deciphering the mechanisms underlying a repertoire of intra-specific dispersal strategies is a critical step to understand dispersal evolution (e.g., how species modulate their dispersal response when facing environmental changes, or how variability in dispersal syndromes impacts ecosystem function or metapopulation dynamics) 42,49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used an experimental approach linking ecological and cell biology competencies to determine how innate and plastic changes to fine-scale cellular activities can impact the dispersal process. Deciphering the mechanisms underlying a repertoire of intra-specific dispersal strategies is a critical step to understand dispersal evolution (e.g., how species modulate their dispersal response when facing environmental changes, or how variability in dispersal syndromes impacts ecosystem function or metapopulation dynamics) 42,49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pushed and pulled expansions can differ in (relative) speed, genetic diversity (Dahirel et al, 2020) and, as our results show here, phenotypic composition. Lineages/individuals with different dispersal strategies may also differ in traits influencing population stability (Jacob et al, 2019) or ecosystem functioning (Cote et al, 2017; Little et al, 2019). Understanding what environmental conditions favour or disfavour the evolutionary maintenance of “pushiness” during expansions may help more generally to understand the evolution of many traits during range expansions, and the possible functional effects of expanding species on ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersal syndromes can also modulate ecosystem functioning through trophic interactions when resource use differs between residents and dispersers (Cote et al 2017b). Hence, primary evidence emerged, showing that dispersers of Dikerogammarus villosus -a freshwater amphipod decomposer- consume more detritus than residents, increasing the decomposition rate of organic material in colonizing habitats (Little et al 2019). Interestingly, effects differed between the two related study species, suggesting that the effects of dispersal syndromes on ecosystem functioning might be species-dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further tested whether intraspecific variability in dispersal syndromes (i.e., differences between genotypes in the measured dispersal-related traits) mediates these ecosystem effects. We expected dispersal syndromes to affect biomass production because of functional differences between dispersers and residents (Little et al 2019), and we expected that these effects might be genotype-dependent if the traits associated with dispersal vary among genotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%