1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(88)80016-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersal, inbreeding avoidance and reproductive success in white-footed mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
50
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance an individual moved was expressed as mean distance between successive captures (MDBSC), calculated using the program Capture-Mark-Recapture (CMR, Le Boulengé 1987). Juveniles were excluded from all spatial analyses due to a greater likelihood of transient and/or dispersal behavior (Wolff et al 1988;Wolff 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance an individual moved was expressed as mean distance between successive captures (MDBSC), calculated using the program Capture-Mark-Recapture (CMR, Le Boulengé 1987). Juveniles were excluded from all spatial analyses due to a greater likelihood of transient and/or dispersal behavior (Wolff et al 1988;Wolff 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More rodents abandoned their home ranges in the years of low than in the year of high density. In non-cyclic populations, the rate of dispersal is typically higher at low than at high densities (Mazurkiewicz and Rajska-Jurgiel 1975, Jannett 1978, Jones et al 1988, Wolff et al 1988, Bujalska and Griim 1989, Jones 1989, Wolff and Cicirello 1990, Hansson 1991, Chistova 1995, Lukyanov 1995, as a consequence of resource limitation as well as competition for mates or space to breed. Dispersal rates decline with increasing availability of resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these results are more useful than estimates of Nm derived from F ST (Austin et al 2004). We also tested whether a greater proportion of males, specifically younger males (\18 g; Cummings and Vessey 1994), are immigrants in small patches compared to large patches since juvenile males have been documented as the primary disperser in this species in field-based studies (e.g., Wolff et al 1988) and in a genetic study (Mossman and Waser 1999).…”
Section: Recent Migration Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%