2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rio.2022.100273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispensability of the conventional Tauc’s plot for accurate bandgap determination from UV–vis optical diffuse reflectance data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical band gap of both films was estimated by converting the wavelength to photon energy and plotting % R vs photon energy (Figure , right). The estimated band gap is then extrapolated from the reflectance curve. , The value returned for the film deposited from 2 at 600 °C gave an estimated band gap of 1.78 eV, and the film deposited from the starting materials at 600 °C gave a value of 1.75 eV (Figure S22, right). These values lie between the literature band gap values for bulk MoS 2 (∼1.3 eV) and monolayer samples (∼1.9 eV), , consistent with reported values for few layer samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical band gap of both films was estimated by converting the wavelength to photon energy and plotting % R vs photon energy (Figure , right). The estimated band gap is then extrapolated from the reflectance curve. , The value returned for the film deposited from 2 at 600 °C gave an estimated band gap of 1.78 eV, and the film deposited from the starting materials at 600 °C gave a value of 1.75 eV (Figure S22, right). These values lie between the literature band gap values for bulk MoS 2 (∼1.3 eV) and monolayer samples (∼1.9 eV), , consistent with reported values for few layer samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Y-axis shows the product of the absorption coefficient with energy (αhv) 2 as the dependent variable. Using the Tauc plot method, the band gap of the photocatalyst can be determined by drawing a straight line between the outcome of the absorption coefficient [29].…”
Section: The Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where S is the scattering coefficient, R ∞ (R sample /R standard ) is the diffuse reflectance of the infinitely thick specimen, and K is the absorption coefficient. [92] Furthermore, the optical energy bandgap can be esti- been investigated to explore the electrical and optical properties of the ZnO nanostructure. [93] The upsurge in the optical bandgap of the ZnO structure with the growing concentration of Eu doping was observed.…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kubelka–Munk function is written as; F ( R ∞ ) = K / S = ( 1‐R ∞ ) / 2 R ∞ , where S is the scattering coefficient, R ∞ ( R sample / R standard ) is the diffuse reflectance of the infinitely thick specimen, and K is the absorption coefficient. [ 92 ] Furthermore, the optical energy bandgap can be estimated from the [ F ( R ∞ ) hν ] 1/n versus hν plots using the relationship: [ F ( R ∞ ) hν ] = C ( hν − E g ) n . The n values indicate whether the allowed transitions are direct for n = 1/2 or indirect for n = 2.…”
Section: Properties Of Zno Nanostructurementioning
confidence: 99%