Disparity in Depression Treatment Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations in the United States

Abstract

Objective: Prior work on racial/ethnic disparities in depression treatment has been limited by the scarcity of national samples that include an array of diagnostic and quality indicators and substantial non-English speaking minorities. Using nationally representative data (n=8762), we evaluate differences in access to and quality of depression treatments between ethnic/racial minority patients and non-Latino whites. Method: Access to mental health care was assessed by whether or not any mental health treatment was received in the past year. Quality treatment for acute depression was defined as four or more specialty/general health provider visits in the past year plus antidepressant use for 30 days or more; or eight or more specialty mental health provider visits of at least 30 minutes in length, with no antidepressant use. Results: For those with last year depressive disorder, 63.7% of Latinos, 68.7% of Asians and 58.8% of African Americans, vs. 40.2% of non-Latino whites, did not access any last year mental health treatment (significantly different at p<0.001). We also found that the disparities in the likelihood of both having access and receiving quality care for depression are significantly different for all minority groups as contrasted to non-Latino whites, except Latinos (marginally significant). Conclusion: Simply relying on present healthcare systems without considering the unique barriers to quality care that apply for ethnic and racial minorities is unlikely to affect the pattern of disparities observed. Populations reluctant to come to the clinic for depression care may have correctly anticipated the limited quality available in usual care.

Social Determinants of Risk and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease

“…198 Future longitudinal research is needed to disentangle psychological mediators of the impact of social and economic circumstances on health and the impact of potential interventions to target depression in the context of its socioeconomic correlates. Understanding of these factors among racial/ethnic minorities is important because conditions such as depression and anxiety are more likely to be underdiagnosed and undertreated among minority patients and are more likely to be chronic, [204][205][206][207][208][209] potentially contributing to an earlier and heavier burden of CVD disparities in these groups. [210][211][212] …”

Receipt of High Risk Medications among Elderly Enrollees in Medicare Advantage Plans

“…28 That racial minority status is associated with lower use of mental health services may also explain the slightly lower risk of HRM use in blacks and other non-white groups. [29][30][31] More research is needed to better elucidate the process by which these gender and racial differences arise.…”

Screening for Behavioral Health Issues in Children Enrolled in Massachusetts Medicaid

“…This supports the benefits of screening both for identifying children among those who have historically received fewer services and for early identification. [24][25][26] The fact that more than half of the children identified by the screens had a recent BH history may suggest that screening was not necessary for these children. However, we argue that even for children who have received or are receiving services, a positive screen can provide an opportunity to revisit issues, reconnect children to BH care, assess current regimens and communicate with mental health providers.…”