2018
DOI: 10.2196/preprints.11421
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in Patient-Reported Interest in Web-Based Patient Portals: Survey at an Urban Academic Safety-Net Hospital (Preprint)

Abstract: BACKGROUND Offering hospitalized patients’ enrollment into a health system’s patient portal may improve patient experience and engagement throughout the care continuum, especially across care transitions, but this process is less studied than portal engagement in the ambulatory setting. Patient portal disparities exist and may lead to differences in access or outcomes. As such, it is important to study upstream factors in a typical hospital workflow that could lead to those disparities … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, our study followed the AMC's protocol for offering tablets in which nursing staff assessed a patient's ability to utilize a portal as part of the decision to offer the portal; this approach could have biased our sample toward patients who had higher perceived HLN. 31 As prior work has highlighted bias in perceptions of patients' ability to use the portal and provisioning of portals, 32 33 34 future work should take this potential bias into account and focus on the importance of asking all patients if they are interested in using a portal as well as consider how to systematically assess patients' capacities to use portals when evaluating overall use and impacts. This effort should extend to include non-English speakers and members of underrepresented groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, our study followed the AMC's protocol for offering tablets in which nursing staff assessed a patient's ability to utilize a portal as part of the decision to offer the portal; this approach could have biased our sample toward patients who had higher perceived HLN. 31 As prior work has highlighted bias in perceptions of patients' ability to use the portal and provisioning of portals, 32 33 34 future work should take this potential bias into account and focus on the importance of asking all patients if they are interested in using a portal as well as consider how to systematically assess patients' capacities to use portals when evaluating overall use and impacts. This effort should extend to include non-English speakers and members of underrepresented groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%