The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in heart transplantation

Abstract: Purpose of reviewHeart transplantation remains the gold standard therapy for end stage heart failure, but barriers remain, preventing equitable access to and affecting outcomes following transplantation. The objective of this review is to summarize current and historical literature on the disparities that persist, and to highlight the gaps in evidence for further investigation.Recent findingsAlthough progress has been made to increase the rates of advanced heart failure therapies to racial/ethnic minority popu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Uptake of partial heart transplantation has the potential to address another serious and persistent ethical problem: there are racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes of both congenital heart surgery 4 and heart transplantation. 5 A procedure that is straightforward and reproducible has the potential to improve results for everyone but particularly for the underserved. This may be particularly of benefit in countries where complex neonatal surgery is less well developed; in many of these countries, homografts are not even available.…”
Section: Ethicist Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Uptake of partial heart transplantation has the potential to address another serious and persistent ethical problem: there are racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes of both congenital heart surgery 4 and heart transplantation. 5 A procedure that is straightforward and reproducible has the potential to improve results for everyone but particularly for the underserved. This may be particularly of benefit in countries where complex neonatal surgery is less well developed; in many of these countries, homografts are not even available.…”
Section: Ethicist Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%