2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06545-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices in a Midwest Urban Safety-Net Healthcare System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As another strategy to increase screening rates, urban safety-net hospitals utilize FIT as the initial screening tool for CRC due to its low cost, non-invasive nature, and ease of access [ 21 , 22 ]. However, the same study noted that FIT as an initial screening modality had poor compliance (46 %) and more than half (52 %) of patients with positive FIT did not follow up for colonoscopy [ 21 ]. A delay in colonoscopy >10 months after a positive FIT is associated with higher overall incidence of CRC and late stage CRC [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As another strategy to increase screening rates, urban safety-net hospitals utilize FIT as the initial screening tool for CRC due to its low cost, non-invasive nature, and ease of access [ 21 , 22 ]. However, the same study noted that FIT as an initial screening modality had poor compliance (46 %) and more than half (52 %) of patients with positive FIT did not follow up for colonoscopy [ 21 ]. A delay in colonoscopy >10 months after a positive FIT is associated with higher overall incidence of CRC and late stage CRC [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%