Abstract:Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality have been widely documented for several decades and persist despite advances in receipt of mammography across racial groups. This persistence leads to questions about the roles of biological, social, and health system determinants of poor outcomes. Cancer outcomes are a function not only of innate biological factors but also of modifiable characteristics of individual behavior and decision making as well as characteristics of patient-health system interaction and t… Show more
“…While many providers are aware of mortality disparities in breast cancer that can be linked to these subtypes, future efforts to educate HCPs should build upon this awareness by presenting new research that links these disparities to incidence of specific breast cancer subtypes. 31,32 Recent data suggests that beyond querying patients about family history of breast cancer, asking patients about the pathologic characteristics of their family member's breast cancer can help improve genetic risk assessment. 33 Efforts to provide information to HCPs are important in disseminating prevention strategies for BBC.…”
Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality continue, partly due to higher prevalence of an aggressive breast cancer subtype called basallike breast cancer (BBC) in African-Americans. Health care providers (HCPs) are uniquely positioned to discuss cancer risk and prevention with patients. We investigated breast cancer knowledge and risk communication among HCPs to identify factors that influenced communication with patients. Interviews were conducted with 34 HCPs in North Carolina. We found limited evidence of breast cancer risk education, and specific subtypes of breast cancer were not discussed. Barriers to communication about prevention include limited time, perceived patient receptivity and education level, and scientific misinformation. Factors that prompted discussions included patient characteristics (age, race, and socioeconomic status). To broaden the conversation, HCPs must receive and communicate more accurate information on breast cancer risk. Given these barriers to breast cancer education, additional opportunities to intervene with high-risk populations must be identified.
Keywords:breast cancer, basal-like breast cancer, health communication, risk factors, health disparity Word count: 3917
“…While many providers are aware of mortality disparities in breast cancer that can be linked to these subtypes, future efforts to educate HCPs should build upon this awareness by presenting new research that links these disparities to incidence of specific breast cancer subtypes. 31,32 Recent data suggests that beyond querying patients about family history of breast cancer, asking patients about the pathologic characteristics of their family member's breast cancer can help improve genetic risk assessment. 33 Efforts to provide information to HCPs are important in disseminating prevention strategies for BBC.…”
Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality continue, partly due to higher prevalence of an aggressive breast cancer subtype called basallike breast cancer (BBC) in African-Americans. Health care providers (HCPs) are uniquely positioned to discuss cancer risk and prevention with patients. We investigated breast cancer knowledge and risk communication among HCPs to identify factors that influenced communication with patients. Interviews were conducted with 34 HCPs in North Carolina. We found limited evidence of breast cancer risk education, and specific subtypes of breast cancer were not discussed. Barriers to communication about prevention include limited time, perceived patient receptivity and education level, and scientific misinformation. Factors that prompted discussions included patient characteristics (age, race, and socioeconomic status). To broaden the conversation, HCPs must receive and communicate more accurate information on breast cancer risk. Given these barriers to breast cancer education, additional opportunities to intervene with high-risk populations must be identified.
Keywords:breast cancer, basal-like breast cancer, health communication, risk factors, health disparity Word count: 3917
“…Often, cultural, social, economic, and biological factors interplay together in shaping the risk of breast cancer (Wheeler et al 2013). Studies have suggested that the effect of racial disparities is not comparable to the effect of socioeconomic disparities in explaining the risk of breast cancer (Baquet and Commiskey 2000).…”
A lot of studies have attempted to examine the association between the risk of breast cancer and socioeconomic factors using traditional statistical approaches without considering the spatial variations of socioeconomic variables and their varying effects on the risk of breast cancer. As an alternative, geographically weighted regression (GWR) can address such weakness. However, not all factors are necessarily global factors or local factors. Under this context, this study employs geographically weighted general linear regression (GWGLR) model to analyze the relationship between socioeconomic characteristics and breast cancer risk for the state of Illinois from 1999 to 2013. The study first uses ordinary least square to identify the most influential variables. Then GWR and GWGLR models are constructed based on the same set of variables. The GWGLR models improved both the OLS and GWR models. The spatial and temporal analyses suggest that economic status has a global effect on breast cancer risk. Both low and high economic status could be associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer. Occupation, however, is associated with the risk of breast cancer more as a local factor. The GWGLR models also helped reveal the regional variations of those relationships.
“…The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services made it clear that elimination of health disparities was a national priority [7]. If cancer patients receive less-than-standard treatment, differences in outcomes are likely to result [8]. Reducing these disparities is a critical next step for China.…”
Background.
Substantial progress has been made in the treatment of malignancies in the People's Republic of China in recent years. The goal of this study was to identify the extent to which national treatment guidelines are being used to customize patient care in lung cancer and to analyze the reasons for treatment disparities.
Methods.
Patient characteristics and treatments were investigated retrospectively for the period from October 2004 to January 2013 using the outpatient database of the Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute (GLCI) in China.
Results.
A total of 2,535 outpatients with lung cancer were studied in this retrospective analysis. The treatment disparity was 45.3%. Overall, 20.6% of patients with stage I non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were overtreated, and 20.1% of stage II patients were undertreated. Only 19.6% of stage IIIA patients and 30.7% of stage IIIB patients underwent the recommended combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, respectively. For advanced NSCLC, the greatest treatment disparity appeared in the second‐line setting and beyond. Patients who were positive for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and receiving EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors experienced significant prolongation of survival compared with patients who were EGFR negative or whose EGFR mutation status was unknown (hazard ratio: 0.79; p = .037). The treatment disparities were significantly larger among patients aged younger than 65 years and in patients from developing regions compared with patients aged 65 years and older and from developed regions, respectively (p < .001, p = .046). The difference in treatment disparity was statistically significant between GLCI and other hospitals (p < .001).
Conclusion.
This retrospective study of a large number of patients from an outpatient oncology database demonstrated large disparities in the treatment of lung cancer in China. It is important to develop a new guideline for recommendations that are based on resource classification.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.