2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in alcohol use and heavy episodic drinking among bisexual people: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should investigate these associations with more diverse samples of LGBQ+ people and consider the risk for trauma exposure and minority stress through the lens of intersectionality (i.e., among people who hold multiple minoritized identities). For instance, given that racial minorities tend to experience significant racism that exacerbates coping (Meyer et al, 2008) as well as discrimination from within sexual minority communities (Balsam et al, 2011), and bi+ (i.e., bisexual, pansexual, queer) people tend to experience the highest rates of alcohol use (Shokoohi et al, 2022) and trauma relative to other sexual minorities (Alessi et al, 2013; Roberts et al, 2010), it is likely that examining trauma exposure and minority stress with a more diverse sample through an intersectional framework would reveal a more nuanced understanding of study variables. Although our sample had a diverse representation of sexual and gender identities, our sample size resulted in limited statistical power to test differences across these subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should investigate these associations with more diverse samples of LGBQ+ people and consider the risk for trauma exposure and minority stress through the lens of intersectionality (i.e., among people who hold multiple minoritized identities). For instance, given that racial minorities tend to experience significant racism that exacerbates coping (Meyer et al, 2008) as well as discrimination from within sexual minority communities (Balsam et al, 2011), and bi+ (i.e., bisexual, pansexual, queer) people tend to experience the highest rates of alcohol use (Shokoohi et al, 2022) and trauma relative to other sexual minorities (Alessi et al, 2013; Roberts et al, 2010), it is likely that examining trauma exposure and minority stress with a more diverse sample through an intersectional framework would reveal a more nuanced understanding of study variables. Although our sample had a diverse representation of sexual and gender identities, our sample size resulted in limited statistical power to test differences across these subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age, sexual identity, gender identity, race/ethnicity, and months between the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 11, 2021; World Health Organization, 2020) and the completion of the first daily survey were included as covariates at the between-person level. Prior research with SGM-AFAB has consistently demonstrated differences in substance use and internalizing symptoms based on age, race, ethnicity, gender identity, and sexual identity (Dyar et al, 2015; Dyar, Feinstein, et al, 2020; Fish et al, 2021; Ross et al, 2018; Shokoohi et al, 2022). Therefore, we controlled for age, race, ethnicity, gender identity, and sexual identity at the between-person level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of standard measures, in tandem with the growing proportion of SGM-identified persons in the general population (Jones, 2022), may yield more opportunities for adequately powered subgroup analyses. More work is also needed to address intersectionality (Srivastava et al, 2020) and to better understand the specific mechanisms that may contribute to disparities in AOD use among different groups, as these remain poorly understood, including the effects of intersecting systems of oppression (Shokoohi et al, 2022). A range of quantitative approaches have been used for intersectional quantitative analyses, and Bauer et al’s recent systematic review (2021) summarizes the current state of the science and provides a number of recommendations to move the field forward.…”
Section: Gaps In Understanding Of Contextual Factors and Lived Experi...mentioning
confidence: 99%