2018
DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12550
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities exist between the dietary intake of Indigenous Australian women during pregnancy and the Australian dietary guidelines: the Gomeroi gaaynggal study

Abstract: Although the small cohort limits the generalisability of the findings of the present study, the data obtained indicate that the diets of these Indigenous pregnant women are inadequate. Therefore, strategies aiming to optimise nutrient intakes of Indigenous pregnant women are needed urgently.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(135 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limitation has been addressed using energy cut off points by Meltzer et al [ 29 ]. Further, the AES FFQ, although previously used in pregnancy [ 51 ], has not been validated in this population group, and therefore, the findings of this study need to be interpreted in this context. The current study also examined nutrient intakes from dietary data alone, noting that 74% of women were taking supplements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This limitation has been addressed using energy cut off points by Meltzer et al [ 29 ]. Further, the AES FFQ, although previously used in pregnancy [ 51 ], has not been validated in this population group, and therefore, the findings of this study need to be interpreted in this context. The current study also examined nutrient intakes from dietary data alone, noting that 74% of women were taking supplements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Data was captured during the 3rd trimester only (28–36 weeks’ gestation) and does not take into account differences in intake over the trimesters. However, previous studies indicate little change in dietary patterns over the course of the pregnancy [ 50 , 51 ]. FFQs have a low participant burden compared to other forms of dietary assessment, although self-reported dietary data poses the risk of misreporting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inherent recall bias associated with retrospective self-report surveys is recognised as a limitation. Further, the AES food frequency questionnaire, although previously used in pregnancy [ 42 ], has not been validated in this population group, and, therefore, the findings of this study need to be interpreted in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Full details of the study designs, method of diet data collection, results, and conclusions of the studies are summarized in Table 1 . Of the 22 studies, almost half included dietary data that were 10 or more years old (collected in 2010 or earlier) [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Three of the studies were intervention studies and baseline dietary data were extracted only [ 21 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%